Experts or Politicians? Citizen Responses to Vaccine Endorsements across Five OECD Countries

Author:

Barceló Joan1ORCID,Sheen Greg Chih-Hsin2ORCID,Tung Hans H3ORCID,Wu Wen-Chin4

Affiliation:

1. Division of Social Science, New York University Abu Dhabi Assistant Professor, , Abu Dhabi, UAE

2. Department of Political Science, National Cheng Kung University Assistant Professor, , Tainan City, Taiwan

3. Department of Political Science and Center for Research in Econometric Theory and Applications, National Taiwan University Associate Professor, , Taipei City, Taiwan

4. Institute of Political Science, Academia Sinica Associate Research Fellow, ,Taipei City, Taiwan

Abstract

Who is more influential in shaping citizens' health-related behaviors, experts or politicians? We conduct five conjoint experiments on 6,255 residents of France, Germany, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States, asking them to evaluate COVID-19 vaccines alongside randomly varying endorsements from national politicians and medical professionals. In every country, our results show that citizens are more likely to rely on medical professionals, the experts, more than on politicians when choosing a COVID-19 vaccine. Even after accounting for citizens' political alignment with the government, our evidence reveals that politicians play a very limited role in shaping vaccine acceptance. These results have implications for the role of political elites in shaping people's behaviors amid a large-scale crisis.

Funder

National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan

New York University Abu Dhabi

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,General Social Sciences,Sociology and Political Science,History,Communication

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Perceived government-expert discord and evaluation of COVID-19 policies in Hong Kong;Journal of Asian Public Policy;2024-06-15

2. U.S. Democratic Backsliding and the Decline of Democratic Support Abroad;International Journal of Public Opinion Research;2024-05-17

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3