Affiliation:
1. Advocate Christ Medical Center , Oak Lawn, Illinois , USA
Abstract
Abstract
In order to promote social distancing during the recent COVID-19 pandemic, physicians and healthcare systems have made efforts to replace in-person with virtual clinic visits when feasible. While these efforts have been well received and seem compatible with sound clinical practice, they do not perfectly replicate the experience of a face-to-face exchange between doctor and patient. This essay attempts to describe features of the virtual visit that distinguish it from its face-to-face analog and considers the phenomenological work of Emmanuel Levinas in arguing that these differences may limit the force of the ethical summons a provider would otherwise experience before the face of a patient. The diminishment of this signal therapeutic experience may engender vocational as well as clinical consequences, which should be weighed against the practical benefits of the virtual visit as we consider whether our enthusiasm for this mode of practice should continue.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference16 articles.
1. Short article one’s own face is hard to ignore;Brédart;Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,2006
2. Computers in the clinical encounter: A scoping review and thematic analysis;Crampton;Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association,2016
3. You don’t find your face faster; you just look at it longer;Devue;Cognition,2009
4. Intercorporeality and social distancing: Phenomenological reflections;Dolezal;The Philosopher,2020
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Persons and their Brains: Life, Death, and Lessened Humanity;The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine;2024-03-14