Competent demand pull and technological flows within sectoral systems: the evidence on differences within Europe

Author:

Antonelli Cristiano12,Gehringer Agnieszka34

Affiliation:

1. Università degli Studi di Torino

2. BRICS, Collegio Carlo Alberto (CA)

3. University of Göttingen (AG)

4. Flossbach von Storch Research Institute

Abstract

Abstract The paper implements the competent demand-pull hypothesis that grafts the advances of the economics of knowledge on the Kaldor–Schmookler demand-pull approach. Demand-pulling effects occur only if the increase of derived demand for both capital and intermediary inputs is accompanied by knowledge interactions carried by market transactions. The competent demand-pull hypothesis rejuvenates the standard demand-pull approach through the focus on the sectoral architecture of market-embedded inter-sectoral knowledge linkages between competent users and innovative producers. We measure such market-embedded and competent influence with the derived demand for intermediates—taken from input–output tables—accounting for productivity increases downstream. The empirical evidence from dynamic panel estimations for the European Union (EU) over the period 1995–2007 suggests the presence of strong and positive competent demand impulses, but the effects vary between three EU sectoral systems, the EU core, the East and the South.

Funder

European Union D.G. Research

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Economics and Econometrics

Reference74 articles.

1. Distance to Frontier, Selection, and Economic Growth’, NBER Working Paper no. 9066;Acemoglu,2003

2. Pecuniary knowledge externalities: the convergence of directed technological change and the emergence of innovation systems;Antonelli;Industrial and Corporate Change,2008

3. Handbook on the Economic Complexity of Technological Change

4. Knowledge governance, pecuniary knowledge externalities and total factor productivity growth;Antonelli;Economic Development Quarterly,2013

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Skills shortage and innovation;Industry and Innovation;2021-10-25

2. Reciprocating Business Model Innovation – How Client and Supplier Models Interact;Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing;2021-04-03

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3