How Complete Are Tobacco Sales Data? Assessing the Comprehensiveness of US Tobacco Product Retail Sales Data Through Comparisons to Excise Tax Collections

Author:

Liber Alex C1ORCID,Faraji Maryam2,Ranganathan Radhika1ORCID,Friedman Abigail S3

Affiliation:

1. - Georgetown University, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention and Control Program , Washington, DC , USA

2. - Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health , Ann Arbor, MI , USA

3. - Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale University School of Public Health , New Haven, CT , USA

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Sales data analyses are increasingly used to guide tobacco regulatory science. However, such data do not cover specialist retailers like vape shops or tobacconists. Understanding the extent of the cigarette and electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) markets covered by sales data is critical to establishing such analyses’ generalizability and potential biases. Methods Using retail sales data from Information Resources Incorporated (IRI) and Nielsen, we conduct tax gap analyses comparing states’ cigarette and ENDS tax revenue to tax collection estimates based on retail sales data. For the 23 US states in both retail sales datasets, cigarette tax gap analyses were conducted for each year from 2018 to 2020. Four (Louisiana, North Carolina, Ohio, and Washington) of those 23 states levied per-unit ENDS taxes and provided monthly tax revenue data covering January 2018 to October 2021, where we conducted monthly tax gap analyses for both cigarettes and ENDS. Results Across states covered by both sales datasets, annual mean cigarette sales in IRI and Nielsen account for 92.3% (95% CI = 88.3% to 96.2%) and 84.0% (95% CI = 79.3% to 88.7%) of state cigarette tax revenue, respectively. Monthly average coverage rates for ENDS sales were lower, ranging from 42.3% to 86.1% for IRI and 43.6% to 88.5% for Nielsen, but remained stable over time. Conclusions IRI and Nielsen sales data capture almost the entire US cigarette market and a substantial but lower portion of the US ENDS market. With proper care to address shortcomings, sales data analyses can capture changes in the US market for these tobacco products. Implications Policy evaluations and analyses using e-cigarette and cigarette sales data are often criticized because these data do not cover online sales or sales by specialty retailers like tobacconists. Cigarette sales data consistently cover nearly 90% of taxed sales, while e-cigarette sales data cover around 50% of taxed volumes. Retail sales data capture nearly all cigarette sales and a substantial portion of ENDS sales with relatively stable rates of coverage over time, supporting their continued use in tobacco surveillance and policy evaluation work.

Funder

National Cancer Institute

Food and Drug Administration

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference16 articles.

1. Use of tobacco sales data to inform tobacco control efforts: a scoping review;Mosalpuria,2023

2. Evaluation of statewide restrictions on flavored e-cigarette sales in the US from 2014 to 2020;Ali;JAMA Netw Open,2022

3. Different times call for different measures: using retail sales to monitor the tobacco product landscape;Seaman;Am J Prev Med.,2022

4. Retailer density reduction approaches to tobacco control: a review;Glasser;Health Place,2021

5. Tax avoidance and evasion: cigarette purchases from Indian reservations among US adult smokers, 2010–2011;Wang;Public Health Rep Wash DC 1974.,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3