A Cross-Sectional Survey on Oral Nicotine Pouches: Characterizing Use-Motives, Topography, Dependence Levels, and Adverse Events

Author:

Dowd Ashley N1ORCID,Thrul Johannes234ORCID,Czaplicki Lauren5ORCID,Kennedy Ryan D5ORCID,Moran Meghan B5ORCID,Spindle Tory R1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD , USA

2. Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore, MD , USA

3. Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins , Baltimore, MD , USA

4. Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, La Trobe University , Melbourne, VIC , Australia

5. Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health , Baltimore, MD , USA

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Oral nicotine pouches (ONPs) contain a crystalized nicotine powder instead of tobacco leaves. ONPs come in a variety of flavors and are often marketed as “tobacco-free,” but research on ONP use-motivations and related experiences is limited. Aims and Methods This cross-sectional web-based survey collected self-report data on ONP use-characteristics (eg, frequency), brands and flavors used, use-motivations, dependence (Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence-Smokeless Tobacco [FTND-ST]), and ONP-related adverse events (AEs) experienced. Results The sample included 118 adults who reported current (past 30-day) ONP use. On average (SD), participants reported ONP use on 13 (6) days during the past month. Most participants (% of the sample) also reported the use of tobacco cigarettes (74%) and/or electronic cigarettes (53%) during the past month. Zyn (27%) and Lucy (19%) were the most currently used ONP brands with mint (23%) and tobacco (16%) as the most currently used flavors. The availability of preferred flavors was the most frequently reported (31%) ONP use-motivation. The sample demonstrated significant dependence levels (FTND-ST = 7, SD = 2). Reported AEs included mouth lesions (48%), upset stomach (39%), sore mouth (37%), sore throat (21%), and nausea (9%). Results should be interpreted in the context of study limitations, including using a relatively small and homogeneous online convenience sample. Acknowledging the limitations, this sample was deemed appropriate to include considering the novelty of the findings, the dearth of related research, and the necessity of examining foundational ONP use-characteristics (eg, topography, AEs); however, future research should consider recruiting larger and more generalizable samples. Conclusions The availability of preferred flavors was a key ONP use-motivation in this sample. Mint and tobacco were the most currently used flavors, with Zyn and Lucy being the most currently used ONP brands. Participants reported dependence and a substantial number of ONP-related AEs. Nationally representative surveys should investigate ONP use along with outcomes included in the current study (eg, AEs) to inform ONP surveillance and policy development efforts. Implications This study is among the first to assess reasons for initiating/maintaining ONP use as well as other relevant use-experiences (eg, AEs, dependence). These results highlight the role of flavors and nicotine dependence in ONP use, which are important considerations for informing ONP regulations.

Funder

National Institute on Drug Abuse

Food and Drug Administration

Center for Tobacco Products

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference17 articles.

1. Nicotine pouches: a summary of regulatory approaches across 67 countries;Duren;Tob Control.,2023

2. Tobacco companies introduce ‘tobacco-free’ nicotine pouches;Robichaud;Tob Control.,2020

3. Assessing consumer use and behaviour patterns of oral nicotine pouches in a multi-country study;Prasad;Int J Sci Rep,2022

4. Tobacco-free nicotine pouch use in Great Britain: a representative population survey 2020–2021;Tattan-Birch;Nicotine Tob Res.,2022

5. Awareness, susceptibility, and use of oral nicotine pouches and comparative risk perceptions with smokeless tobacco among young adults in the United States;Morean;PLoS One.,2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3