Polypill-based strategy vs. usual care for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract

Abstract Aims We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the impact of a polypill-based strategy (PBS) on therapeutic adherence and cardiovascular outcomes compared with usual care for secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Methods and results We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus databases from inception to January 2023, including RCTs comparing PBS with usual care in patients with prior CVD. We assessed efficacy outcomes of therapeutic adherence, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) and safety outcomes of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Statistical analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.4.1 and R Version 4.2.1. A total of 8 RCTs with a population of 6541 individuals were included, of whom 3318 (50.7%) were treated with the PBS. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 60 months. The polypill-based strategy was associated with a significantly increased therapeutic adherence [risk ratio (RR) 1.22; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10–1.34; P < 0.001]. Cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.44–0.85; P = 0.004), SBP [mean difference (MD) −1.47 mmHg; 95% CI −2.86 to −0.09; P = 0.04], and LDL-C (MD −3.83 mg/dL; 95% CI −6.99 to −0.67; P = 0.02) were significantly lower in the PBS group. The incidence of all-cause mortality was similar between groups (RR 0.83; 95% CI 0.54–1.29; P = 0.41). Conclusion In patients with pre-existing CVD, a PBS is associated with lower cardiovascular mortality and improved therapeutic adherence, along with a modest decrease in SBP and LDL-C compared with usual care. Thus, a PBS may be considered a preferred option for this patient population.