Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation vs. percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic coronary syndrome: impact on morbidity and mortality

Author:

Buckley Benjamin J R12,de Koning Iris A3ORCID,Harrison Stephanie L12,Fazio-Eynullayeva Elnara4,Underhill Paula5,Kemps Hareld M C67,Lip Gregory Y H1289ORCID,Thijssen Dick H J38

Affiliation:

1. Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, William Henry Duncan Building, Liverpool L7 8TX, UK

2. Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L7 8TX, UK

3. Department of Physiology, Research Institute for Health Science, Radboud University Medical Centrum, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands

4. TriNetX Inc., 125 Cambridgepark Drive, Suite 500 Cambridge, MA 02140, USA

5. TriNetX Inc., London, England EC3V 4AB, GB, UK

6. Department of Cardiology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, Dominee Theodor Fliednerstraat 1, 5631 BM Eindhoven, The Netherlands

7. Department of Industrial Design, Eindhoven University of Technology, Dominee Theodor Fliednerstraat 1, 5631, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

8. Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK

9. Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Søndre Skovvej 15, Forskningens Hus 9000, Aalborg, Denmark

Abstract

Abstract Aims Accumulating evidence questions the clinical value of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). We therefore compare the impact of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) vs. PCI in patients with CCS on 18-month mortality and morbidity, and evaluate the effects of combining PCI with exercise-based CR. Methods and results A retrospective cohort study was conducted in March 2021. An online, real-world dataset of CCS patients was acquired, utilizing TriNetX, a global federated health research network. Patients with CCS who received PCI were first compared with patients who were prescribed exercise-based CR. Second, we compared patients who received both CR + PCI vs. CR alone. For both comparisons, patients were propensity-score matched by age, sex, race, comorbidities, medications, and procedures. We ascertained 18-month incidence of all-cause mortality, rehospitalization, and cardiovascular comorbidity [stroke, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and new-onset heart failure]. The initial cohort consisted of 18 383 CCS patients. Following propensity score matching, exercise-based CR was associated with significantly lower odds of all-cause mortality [0.37 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.29–0.47)], rehospitalization [0.29 (95% CI: 0.27–0.32)], and cardiovascular morbidities, compared to PCI. Subsequently, patients that received both CR + PCI did not have significantly different odds for all-cause mortality [1.00 (95% CI: 0.63–1.60)], rehospitalization [1.00 (95% CI: 0.82–1.23)], AMI [1.11 (95% CI: 0.68–1.81)], and stroke [0.71 (95% CI: 0.39–1.31)], compared to CR only. Conclusions Compared to PCI, exercise-based CR associated with significantly lower odds of 18-month all-cause mortality, rehospitalization, and cardiovascular morbidity in patients with CCS, whilst combining PCI and exercise-based CR associated with lower incident heart failure only.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Epidemiology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3