Winners do what they fear: exercise and peripheral arterial disease—an umbrella review

Author:

Peñín-Grandes Saúl1ORCID,López-Ortiz Susana1ORCID,Maroto-Izquierdo Sergio1ORCID,Menéndez Héctor1ORCID,Pinto-Fraga José1ORCID,Martín-Hernández Juan1ORCID,Lista Simone1ORCID,Lucia Alejandro23ORCID,Santos-Lozano Alejandro12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. i+HeALTH Strategic Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, Miguel de Cervantes European University (UEMC) , Padre Julio Chevalier Street, 2, 47012, Valladolid, Castilla y León , Spain

2. Research Institute of the Hospital 12 de Octubre (‘imas12’ and ‘PaHerg group’) , Madrid , Spain

3. Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid , Madrid , Spain

Abstract

Abstract Aims This systematic review aims to evaluate and summarize findings from published meta-analyses on the effects of regular exercise in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The review will assess the impact of exercise on functional parameters, health-related quality of life, haemodynamic parameters, physical activity levels, adverse events, and mortality. Methods and results A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases (up to May 2023) to identify meta-analyses including randomized controlled trials that examined the effects of regular exercise in patients with PAD. Sixteen studies, with a total of 198 meta-analyses, were identified. Results revealed with strong evidence that patients with PAD who exercised improved functional and health-related quality of life parameters. Specifically, supervised aerobic exercise (i.e. walking to moderate–maximum claudication pain) improves maximum walking distance [mean difference (MD): 177.94 m, 95% confidence interval (CI) 142.29–213.60; P < 0.00001; I2: 65%], pain-free walking distance (fixed MD: 68.78 m, 95% CI 54.35–83.21; P < 0.00001; I2: 67%), self-reported walking ability [i.e. distance score (MD: 9.22 points, 95% CI 5.74–12.70; P < 0.00001; I2: 0%), speed score (MD: 8.71 points, 95% CI 5.64–11.77; P < 0.00001, I2: 0%), stair-climbing score (MD: 8.02 points, 95% CI 4.84–11.21; P < 0.00001, I2: 0%), and combined score (MD: 8.76 points, 95% CI 2.78–14.74; P < 0.0001, I2: 0%)], aerobic capacity (fixed MD: 0.62 mL/kg/min, 95% CI 0.47–0.77, P < 0.00001, I2: 64%), and pain score (MD: 7.65, 95% CI 3.15–12.15; P = 0.0009; I2: 0%), while resistance exercise improves lower limb strength (standardized mean difference: 0.71, 95% CI 0.29–1.13, P = 0.0009; I2: 0%]. Regarding other outcomes, such as haemodynamic parameters, no significant evidence was found, while physical activity levels, adverse events, and mortality require further investigation. Conclusion Synthesis of the currently available meta-analyses suggests that regular exercise may be beneficial for a broad range of functional tasks improving health-related quality of life in patients with PAD. Supervised aerobic exercise is the best type of exercise to improve walking-related outcomes and pain, while resistance exercise is more effective to improve lower limb strength.

Funder

Spanish Ministry of Universities

Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and Fondos FEDER

Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias [FIS]

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Epidemiology

Reference62 articles.

1. Clinical practice. Peripheral artery disease;Kullo;N Engl J Med,2016

2. Walking exercise therapy effects on lower extremity skeletal muscle in peripheral artery disease;McDermott;Circ Res,2021

3. 2016 AHA/ACC guideline on the management of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines;Gerhard-Herman;Circulation,2017

4. Physical activity during daily life and functional decline in peripheral arterial disease;Garg;Circulation,2009

5. Assessment of functional status and quality of life in claudication;Mays;J Vasc Surg,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3