Efficacy and safety for the achievement of guideline-recommended lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Khan Safi U1ORCID,Khan Muhammad U1ORCID,Virani Salim S2,Khan Muhammad Shahzeb3,Khan Muhammad Zia1ORCID,Rashid Muhammad4,Kalra Ankur5,Alkhouli Mohamad6ORCID,Blaha Michael J78,Blumenthal Roger S78,Michos Erin D78

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, West Virginia University, 1 Medical Center Drive, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA

2. Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affair Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, 2002 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA

3. Department of Medicine, John H Stroger Jr. Hospital of Cook County, 1969 Ogden Ave, Chicago, IL 60612, USA

4. Department of Cardiology, Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, UK

5. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA

6. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA

7. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Blalock 524-D1, Baltimore, MD 21287

8. The Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Blalock 524-D1, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA

Abstract

Abstract Aim The 2018 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Multi-Society Cholesterol Guidelines recommended the addition of non-statins to statin therapy for high-risk secondary prevention patients above a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) threshold of ≥70 mg/dL (1.8 mmol/L). We compared effectiveness and safety of treatment to achieve lower (<70) vs. higher (≥70 mg/dL) LDL-C among patients receiving intensive lipid-lowering therapy (statins alone or plus ezetimibe or proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors). Methods and results Eleven randomized controlled trials (130 070 patients), comparing intensive vs. less-intensive lipid-lowering therapy, with follow-up ≥6 months and sample size ≥1000 patients were selected. Meta-analysis was reported as random effects risk ratios (RRs) [95% confidence intervals] and absolute risk differences (ARDs) as incident cases per 1000 person-years. The median LDL-C levels achieved in lower LDL-C vs. higher LDL-C groups were 62 and 103 mg/dL, respectively. At median follow-up of 2 years, the lower LDL-C vs. higher LDL-C group was associated with significant reduction in all-cause mortality [ARD −1.56; RR 0.94 (0.89–1.00)], cardiovascular mortality [ARD −1.49; RR 0.90 (0.81–1.00)], and reduced risk of myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular events, revascularization, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). These benefits were achieved without increasing the risk of incident cancer, diabetes mellitus, or haemorrhagic stroke. All-cause mortality benefit in lower LDL-C group was limited to statin therapy and those with higher baseline LDL-C (≥100 mg/dL). However, the RR reduction in ischaemic and safety endpoints was independent of baseline LDL-C or drug therapy. Conclusion This meta-analysis showed that treatment to achieve LDL-C levels below 70 mg/dL using intensive lipid-lowering therapy can safely reduce the risk of mortality and MACE.

Funder

Department of Veterans Affairs, World Heart Federation

Tahir and Jooma Family

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Epidemiology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3