Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction: lack of prognostic predictive power of ventilatory variables

Abstract

Abstract Aims The indication for cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in predictive evaluation has been extended beyond chronic heart failure (HF) patients to include asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction (ALVD) patients, but its prognostic value is still unclear. We aimed to verify if CPET can predict outcome in ALVD and to identify which of the CPET parameters predictive in chronic HF are also effective in ALVD patients. Methods and results We screened ALVD (LVEF ≤ 40% without HF symptoms) and HF patients for cardiac death, and compared peak oxygen consumption (pVO2), exertional oscillatory ventilation (EOV), and ventilatory response (VE/VCO2 slope) between survivors and non-survivors. Asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction and HF patients formed the study population (585 ALVD and 695 HF). Both groups had similar male prevalence (98% vs. 98%; P = 0.345) but ALVD patients were younger (52 ± 10 vs. 60 ± 10 years, P = 0.004). Cardiac death was observed in 142 patients (5% of ALVD, 15% of HF). Exertional oscillatory ventilation occurred in 4% of ALVD, whereas VE/VCO2 slope was significantly lower (30 ± 7 vs. 35 ± 4) and pVO2 higher (16 ± 4 vs. 14 ± 3 mL/kg/min) than in chronic HF patients. Asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction non-survivors had a significantly greater EOV incidence (13% vs. 3%, P = 0.003), lower pVO2 (13 ± 4 vs. 16 ± 3 mL/kg/min P = 0.000) and higher VE/VCO2 slope (33 ± 7 vs. 31 ± 5, P = 0.032). No ventilatory parameter had prognostic value at multivariable analysis in ALVD patients. Conclusions Cardiopulmonary exercise testing can predict events in ALVD patients, but the risk stratification relies on different parameters than in HF patients. Further analysis in a multi-centre trial is required to better quantify the predictive impact of CPET risk parameters in ALVD patients.