The Effect of Streaming Chat on Perceptions of Political Debates

Author:

Asbury-Kimmel Victoria1,Chang Keng-Chi2,McCabe Katherine T3ORCID,Munger Kevin4,Ventura Tiago5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Sociology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA

2. Department of Political Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA

3. Department of Political Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA

4. Department of Political Science and Social Data Analytics, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA 19165, USA

5. Department of Government and Politics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA

Abstract

Abstract Broadcast media consumption is becoming more social. Many online video “livestreams” come with embedded livestreaming chatboxes, uniting the on-screen and social components. We investigate how streaming chat shapes perceptions of political events. We conducted a field experiment during the September 2019 Democratic Primary Debate where subjects were assigned to view the debate with or without streaming chat. We use text analyses to characterize the frequency, toxicity, and tone of comments in the chat. Our experimental findings indicate that Democratic subjects assigned to the Facebook (social) chat condition reported lower affect toward Democrats and a worse viewing experience, aligned with the toxic and overwhelming nature of the chat. The polarity of candidate-directed comments also influenced candidate evaluations and perceived performance in the polls. This suggests that consumers of mass media will be both more immediately affected by social feedback and likely to make inferences about the experiences of their fellow consumers.

Funder

Russell Sage Foundation in conjunction with the Summer Institutes in Computational Social Science at Princeton in 2019

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics,Communication

Reference66 articles.

1. What to believe? Social media commentary and belief in misinformation;Anspach;Political Behavior,2020

2. Changing Minds or Changing Channels?

3. Social media use in 2021;Auxier;Pew Research Center,2021

4. Second screening and political persuasion on social media;Barnidge;Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media,2017

5. A meta-analysis of the effects of viewing U.S. presidential debates;Benoit;Communication Monographs,2003

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3