Classification below the species level: when are infraspecific groups biologically meaningful?

Author:

Reydon Thomas A C1ORCID,Kunz Werner2

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Philosophy & Centre for Ethics and Law in the Life Sciences (CELLS), Leibniz University Hannover, Im Moore 21, 30167 Hannover, Germany

2. Institute for Genetics, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Universitätsstraße 1, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany

Abstract

Abstract Infraspecific taxa (subspecies, races and varieties) are often seen as real entities in nature and recognized as biologically meaningful groups. But because infraspecific taxa by definition are subdivisions of species, their status depends entirely on the status of ‘their’ species. This makes the status of infraspecific taxa crucially dependent on the way species are considered and thus on the various species concepts that have been advanced as answers to the ‘species problem’. Accordingly, there is a profound lack of clarity regarding the following questions. What are infraspecific taxa? What is their biological meaning? Are they real entities or merely instrumental units? When should an infraspecific group be ranked and named as an infraspecific taxon? In this paper, we aim to contribute to greater clarity about these issues by examining which types of infraspecific groups are biologically meaningful in light of the main results from the species debate.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Reference70 articles.

1. The impact of species concept on biodiversity studies;Agapow;The Quarterly Review of Biology,2004

2. Race: biological reality or social construct?;Andreasen;Philosophy of Science,2000

3. The cladistic race concept: a defense;Andreasen;Biology and Philosophy,2004

4. Ecological factors in speciation of Peromyscus;Blair;Evolution,1950

5. The subspecies concept in butterflies: has its application in taxonomy and conservation biology outlived its usefulness?;Braby;Biological Journal of the Linnean Society,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3