Complexities in the Exchange of Private Information in Inter-Organisational Networks: The Challenge of Justification

Author:

Van Haute Dorien1,Roets Griet1,Vandenbroeck Michel1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Social Work and Social Pedagogy, Ghent University, H. Dunantlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium

Abstract

Abstract In this contribution, we focus on the question of how social workers actually deal with the complexity of sharing private information in three local networks of social provision that aim to combat child poverty. Building on the existing body of social work research, we discuss how practices for exchanging private information are enmeshed in a field of tension between both regulation and discretion. This complexity reveals a major challenge for social workers to justify their interventions. Based on a combination of qualitative semi-structured interviews with social workers in the network and participant observation during the network meetings, we examine the strategies of discretion, considerations and potential justifications of social workers in dealing with private information. Our analysis reveals three major themes: (i) legitimacy to act, (ii) deserving versus undeserving families and (iii) powerlessness to collectively act. We conclude that a rights-based approach can be crucial as a normative value orientation and as a point of reference to enable social workers in justifying how and why they exchange private information about families in poverty situations.

Funder

Belgian Federal Science Policy Office

BELSPO

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Health (social science)

Reference45 articles.

1. Desperately seeking fusion: On “joined-up thinking”, “holistic practice” and the new economy of welfare professional power;Allen;British Journal of Social Work,2003

2. Managing restructured social services: Expanding the social?;Aronson;British Journal of Social Work,2010

3. Identity work and critical social service management: Balancing on a tightrope?;Aronson;British Journal of Social Work,2011

4. Multi-agency working in British social policy: Risk, information sharing and privacy;Bellamy;Information Polity,2005

5. Information-sharing and confidentiality in social policy: Regulating multi-agency working;Bellamy;Public Administration,2008

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3