Affiliation:
1. Department of Social Work and Social Pedagogy, Ghent University, H. Dunantlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
Abstract
Abstract
In this contribution, we focus on the question of how social workers actually deal with the complexity of sharing private information in three local networks of social provision that aim to combat child poverty. Building on the existing body of social work research, we discuss how practices for exchanging private information are enmeshed in a field of tension between both regulation and discretion. This complexity reveals a major challenge for social workers to justify their interventions. Based on a combination of qualitative semi-structured interviews with social workers in the network and participant observation during the network meetings, we examine the strategies of discretion, considerations and potential justifications of social workers in dealing with private information. Our analysis reveals three major themes: (i) legitimacy to act, (ii) deserving versus undeserving families and (iii) powerlessness to collectively act. We conclude that a rights-based approach can be crucial as a normative value orientation and as a point of reference to enable social workers in justifying how and why they exchange private information about families in poverty situations.
Funder
Belgian Federal Science Policy Office
BELSPO
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Health (social science)
Reference45 articles.
1. Desperately seeking fusion: On “joined-up thinking”, “holistic practice” and the new economy of welfare professional power;Allen;British Journal of Social Work,2003
2. Managing restructured social services: Expanding the social?;Aronson;British Journal of Social Work,2010
3. Identity work and critical social service management: Balancing on a tightrope?;Aronson;British Journal of Social Work,2011
4. Multi-agency working in British social policy: Risk, information sharing and privacy;Bellamy;Information Polity,2005
5. Information-sharing and confidentiality in social policy: Regulating multi-agency working;Bellamy;Public Administration,2008
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献