Myocardial ischaemic syndromes: a new nomenclature to harmonize evolving international clinical practice guidelines

Author:

Boden William E1ORCID,De Caterina Raffaele2ORCID,Kaski Juan Carlos3,Merz Noel Bairey4,Berry Colin5ORCID,Marzilli Mario2,Pepine Carl J6,Barbato Emanuele7ORCID,Stefanini Giulio89,Prescott Eva10,Steg Philippe Gabriel11ORCID,Bhatt Deepak L12,Hill Joseph A13,Crea Filippo14

Affiliation:

1. VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston University School of Medicine , 150 S. Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02130 , USA

2. Division of Cardiology, University of Pisa and Pisa University Hospital , Pisa , Italy

3. Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St. George’s University of London , London , UK

4. Barbra Streisand Women’s Heart Center, Cedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute , Los Angeles, CA , USA

5. British Heart Foundation, Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow , Glasgow , UK

6. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Florida School of Medicine , Gainesville, FL , USA

7. Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome , Rome , Italy

8. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University , Pieve Emanuele, Milan , Italy

9. Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS , Milan , Italy

10. Centre for Cardiovascular Research, Bispebjerg Frederiksberg University Hospital , Copenhagen , Denmark

11. Université Paris-Cité, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, FACT and INSERM U1148 , Paris , France

12. Mount Sinai Heart, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Health System , New York City, NY , USA

13. Department of Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center , Dallas, TX , USA

14. Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore , Rome , Italy

Abstract

Abstract Since the 1960s, cardiologists have adopted several binary classification systems for acute myocardial infarction (MI) that facilitated improved patient management. Conversely, for chronic stable manifestations of myocardial ischaemia, various classifications have emerged over time, often with conflicting terminology—e.g. ‘stable coronary artery disease’ (CAD), ‘stable ischaemic heart disease’, and ‘chronic coronary syndromes’ (CCS). While the 2019 European guidelines introduced CCS to impart symmetry with ‘acute coronary syndromes’ (ACS), the 2023 American guidelines endorsed the alternative term ‘chronic coronary disease’. An unintended consequence of these competing classifications is perpetuation of the restrictive terms ‘coronary’ and ‘disease’, often connoting only a singular obstructive CAD mechanism. It is now important to advance a more broadly inclusive terminology for both obstructive and non-obstructive causes of angina and myocardial ischaemia that fosters conceptual clarity and unifies dyssynchronous nomenclatures across guidelines. We, therefore, propose a new binary classification of ‘acute myocardial ischaemic syndromes’ and ‘non-acute myocardial ischaemic syndromes’, which comprises both obstructive epicardial and non-obstructive pathogenetic mechanisms, including microvascular dysfunction, vasospastic disorders, and non-coronary causes. We herein retain accepted categories of ACS, ST-segment elevation MI, and non-ST-segment elevation MI, as important subsets for which revascularization is of proven clinical benefit, as well as new terms like ischaemia and MI with non-obstructive coronary arteries. Overall, such a more encompassing nomenclature better aligns, unifies, and harmonizes different pathophysiologic causes of myocardial ischaemia and should result in more refined diagnostic and therapeutic approaches targeted to the multiple pathobiological precipitants of angina pectoris, ischaemia and infarction.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference37 articles.

1. Universal definition of myocardial infarction;Thygesen;Circulation,2007

2. , for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018);Thygesen;J Am Coll Cardiol,2018

3. 2021 aha/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines;Gulati;Circulation,2021

4. The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons reasoning for not endorsing the 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI coronary revascularization guidelines;Sabik;Ann Thorac Surg,2022

5. IACTS position statement on “2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization”: section 7.1-a consensus document;Yadava;Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3