Short-term diuretic withdrawal in stable outpatients with mild heart failure and no fluid retention receiving optimal therapy: a double-blind, multicentre, randomized trial

Author:

Rohde Luis E12ORCID,Rover Marciane M3ORCID,Figueiredo Neto Jose A4,Danzmann Luiz C56,Bertoldi Eduardo G7ORCID,Simões Marcus V8,Silvestre Odilson M9ORCID,Ribeiro Antonio L P10,Moura Lidia Zytynski11,Beck-da-Silva Luis12ORCID,Prado Debora10ORCID,Sant'Anna Roberto T3,Bridi Leonardo H3,Zimerman André1,Raupp da Rosa Priscila6,Biolo Andréia1

Affiliation:

1. Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre and Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Ramiro Barcelos 2350, CEP, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil

2. Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Rua Ramiro Barcelos 910, CEP, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil

3. Instituto de Cardiologia, Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil

4. Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luis, MA, Brazil

5. Hospital Universitário da Universidade Luterana do Brasil, Canoas, RS, Brazil

6. Hospital São Lucas da Pontifícia Universidade Católica, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil

7. Hospital Escola da Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil

8. Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil

9. Universidade Federal do Acre, Rio Branco, AC, Brazil

10. Hospital da Clinicas e Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil

11. Hospital Universitário Cajuru da Pontifícia Universidade Católica, Curitiba, PR, Brazil

Abstract

Abstract Aims Although loop diuretics are widely used to treat heart failure (HF), there is scarce contemporary data to guide diuretic adjustments in the outpatient setting. Methods and results In a prospective, randomized and double-blind protocol, we tested the safety and tolerability of withdrawing low-dose furosemide in stable HF outpatients at 11 HF clinics in Brazil. The trial had two blindly adjudicated co-primary outcomes: (i) symptoms assessment quantified as the area under the curve (AUC) of a dyspnoea score on a visual-analogue scale evaluated at 4 time-points (baseline, Day 15, Day 45, and Day 90) and (ii) the proportion of patients maintained without diuretic reuse during follow-up. We enrolled 188 patients (25% females; 59 ± 13 years old; left ventricular ejection fraction = 32 ± 8%) that were randomized to furosemide withdrawal (n = 95) or maintenance (n = 93). For the first co-primary endpoint, no significant difference in patients’ assessment of dyspnoea was observed in the comparison of furosemide withdrawal with continuous administration [median AUC 1875 (interquartile range, IQR 383–3360) and 1541 (IQR 474–3124), respectively; P = 0.94]. For the second co-primary endpoint, 70 patients (75.3%) in the withdrawal group and 77 patients (83.7%) in the maintenance group were free of furosemide reuse during follow-up (odds ratio for additional furosemide use with withdrawal 1.69, 95% confidence interval 0.82–3.49; P = 0.16). Heart failure-related events (hospitalizations, emergency room visits, and deaths) were infrequent and similar between groups (P = 1.0). Conclusions Diuretic withdrawal did not result in neither increased self-perception of dyspnoea nor increased need of furosemide reuse. Diuretic discontinuation may deserve consideration in stable outpatients with no signs of fluid retention receiving optimal medical therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02689180.

Funder

Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development

National Council for Scientific and Technological Development

Brazilian Research Network In Heart Failure

FAPEMIG

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference22 articles.

1. Diretriz Brasileira de Insuficiência Cardíaca Crônica e Aguda;Arq Bras Cardiol,2018

2. Impact of intravenous loop diuretics on outcomes of patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure: insights from the ADHERE registry;Peacock;Cardiology,2009

3. Study Group on Diagnosis of the Working Group on Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology. The Euro Heart Failure Survey programme—a survey on the quality of care among patients with heart failure in Europe. Part 2: treatment;Komajda;Eur Heart J,2003

4. . I Brazilian Registry of Heart Failure—clinical aspects, care quality and hospitalization outcomes;Albuquerque;Arq Bras Cardiol,2015

5. Relation of loop diuretic dose to mortality in advanced heart failure;Eshaghian;Am J Cardiol,2006

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3