Cardiac mortality in patients randomised to elective coronary revascularisation plus medical therapy or medical therapy alone: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Navarese Eliano P123,Lansky Alexandra J4,Kereiakes Dean J5,Kubica Jacek13,Gurbel Paul A6,Gorog Diana A78,Valgimigli Marco9,Curzen Nick1011,Kandzari David E12,Bonaca Marc P13,Brouwer Marc14,Umińska Julia15,Jaguszewski Milosz J16,Raggi Paolo2,Waksman Ron17,Leon Martin B1819,Wijns William20,Andreotti Felicita2122

Affiliation:

1. Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine Research, Department of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland

2. Faculty of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

3. SIRIO MEDICINE research network, Poland

4. Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA

5. Christ Hospital and Lindner Research Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA

6. Sinai Center for Thrombosis Research and Drug Development, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA

7. Faculty of Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK

8. Cardiology Department, East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Stevenage, UK

9. Department of Cardiology, Inselspital Universitätsspital, Bern, Switzerland

10. University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK

11. University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

12. Department of Interventional Cardiology, Piedmont Heart Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA

13. CPC Clinical Research, University of Colorado School of Medicine, USA

14. Department of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands

15. Department of Geriatrics, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland

16. 1st Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland

17. Section of Interventional Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA

18. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA

19. Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA

20. The Lambe Institute for Translational Medicine and Curam, National University of Ireland Galway and Saolta University Healthcare Group, Galway, Ireland

21. Direzione Scientifica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy

22. Cardiovascular Medicine, Catholic University Medical School, Rome, Italy

Abstract

Abstract Aims The value of elective coronary revascularisation plus medical therapy over medical therapy alone in managing stable patients with coronary artery disease is debated. We reviewed all trials comparing the two strategies in this population. Methods and results From inception through November 2020, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and other databases were searched for randomised trials comparing revascularisation against medical therapy alone in clinically stable coronary artery disease patients. Treatment effects were measured by rate ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals, using random-effects models. Cardiac mortality was the pre-specified primary endpoint. Spontaneous myocardial infarction (MI) and its association with cardiac mortality were secondary endpoints. Further endpoints included all-cause mortality, any MI, and stroke. Longest follow-up data were abstracted. The study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021225598). Twenty-five trials involving 19 806 patients (10 023 randomised to revascularisation plus medical therapy and 9783 to medical therapy alone) were included. Compared with medical therapy alone, revascularisation yielded a lower risk of cardiac death [RR 0.79 (0.67–0.93), P < 0.01] and spontaneous MI [RR 0.74 (0.64–0.86), P < 0.01]. By meta-regression, the cardiac death risk reduction after revascularisation, compared with medical therapy alone, was linearly associated with follow-up duration [RR per 4-year follow-up: 0.81 (0.69–0.96), P = 0.008], spontaneous MI absolute difference (P = 0.01) and percentage of multivessel disease at baseline (P = 0.004). Trial sequential and sensitivity analyses confirmed the reliability of the cardiac mortality findings. All-cause mortality [0.94 (0.87–1.01), P = 0.11], any MI (P = 0.14), and stroke risk (P = 0.30) did not differ significantly between strategies. Conclusion In stable coronary artery disease patients, randomisation to elective coronary revascularisation plus medical therapy led to reduced cardiac mortality compared with medical therapy alone. The cardiac survival benefit after revascularisation improved with longer follow-up times and was associated with fewer spontaneous MIs.

Funder

AstraZeneca

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3