Lack of specialist care is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in adult congenital heart disease: a population-based study

Author:

Diller Gerhard-Paul12ORCID,Orwat Stefan1ORCID,Lammers Astrid Elisabeth13,Radke Robert M1ORCID,De-Torres-Alba Fernando1,Schmidt Renate1,Marschall Ursula4,Bauer Ulrike M25,Enders Dominic6,Bronstein Leo6,Kaleschke Gerrit1ORCID,Baumgartner Helmut12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology III—Adult Congenital and Valvular Heart Disease, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer Campus 1, Building A1, Münster 48149, Germany

2. National Register for Congenital Heart Disease, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin 13353, Germany

3. Department of Paediatric Cardiology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer Campus 1, Building A1, Münster 48149, Germany

4. Department of Medicine and Health Services Research, BARMER Health Insurance, Wuppertal 42266, Germany

5. DZHK (Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung), Potsdamer Straße 58, Berlin 10785, Germany

6. Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer Campus 1, Building A1, Münster 48149, Germany

Abstract

Abstract Aims The aim of this study was to provide population-based data on the healthcare provision for adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) and the impact of cardiology care on morbidity and mortality in this vulnerable population. Methods and results Based on administrative data from one of the largest German Health Insurance Companies, all insured ACHD patients (<70 years of age) were included. Patients were stratified into those followed exclusively by primary care physicians (PCPs) and those with additional cardiology follow-up between 2014 and 2016. Associations between level of care and outcome were assessed by multivariable/propensity score Cox analyses. Overall, 24 139 patients (median age 43 years, 54.8% female) were included. Of these, only 49.7% had cardiology follow-up during the 3-year period, with 49.2% of patients only being cared for by PCPs and 1.1% having no contact with either. After comprehensive multivariable and propensity score adjustment, ACHD patients under cardiology follow-up had a significantly lower risk of death [hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67–0.98; P = 0.03) or major events (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.78–0.92; P < 0.001) compared to those only followed by PCPs. At 3-year follow-up, the absolute risk difference for mortality was 0.9% higher in ACHD patients with moderate/severe complexity lesions cared by PCPs compared to those under cardiology follow-up. Conclusion Cardiology care compared with primary care is associated with superior survival and lower rates of major complications in ACHD. It is alarming that even in a high resource setting with well-established specialist ACHD care approximately 50% of contemporary ACHD patients are still not linked to regular cardiac care. Almost all patients had at least one contact with a PCP during the study period, suggesting that opportunities to refer patients to cardiac specialists were missed at PCP level. More efforts are required to alert PCPs and patients to appropriate ACHD care.

Funder

Research in the Department of Cardiology III

University Hospital Münster

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference22 articles.

1. ESC Guidelines for the management of grown-up congenital heart disease (new version 2010);Baumgartner;Eur Heart J,2010

2. 2018 AHA/ACC Guideline for the management of adults with congenital heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines;Stout;Circulation,2019

3. Lifetime prevalence of congenital heart disease in the general population from 2000 to 2010;Marelli;Circulation,2014

4. Congenital heart defects in the United States: estimating the magnitude of the affected population in 2010;Gilboa;Circulation,2016

5. Congenital heart disease in the general population: changing prevalence and age distribution;Marelli;Circulation,2007

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3