Some good reasons to proceed with the occlusion of the auricle

Abstract

Abstract Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia. The most fearful complication of AF is represented by cardio-embolic stroke and 30% of ischaemic strokes are attributable to AF. The prevention of cardio-embolic risk is therefore based on oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT). Some categories of patients do not benefit from OAT. These are patients at increased bleeding risk and with varying degrees of contraindication to long-term anticoagulant therapy. On the opposite are those patients who develop an embolic event related to AF despite a well-conducted OAT. These types of patients benefit from an interventional approach, percutaneous closure of the left auricle (LAAO), aimed at eliminating what is the primary source of AF-related thrombo-embolism, precisely the left auricle. Percutaneous closure of the left auricle has proven to be an effective and safe procedure, significantly reducing the bleeding risks of patients who, after the procedure, will no longer have to take OAT. Furthermore, it has been shown to be effective in reducing cardio-embolic risk. Uncertainty still remains as to what is the optimal antithrombotic therapy after LAAO. In any case, LAAO represents a valid alternative to OAT for those patients in whom it is contraindicated or ineffective.