Efficacy and safety of e-cigarette use for smoking cessation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Author:

Levett J Y1,Filion K B2,Reynier P1,Prell C1,Eisenberg M J1

Affiliation:

1. Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital/McGill University, Center of Clinical Epidemiology, Montreal, Canada

2. Departments of Medicine and of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

Abstract

Abstract Background Quitting smoking substantially reduces the risk of developing cardiovascular disease. Smokers are increasingly turning to electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) to help them quit smoking combustible cigarettes. However, the efficacy and safety of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation remain controversial. Purpose To examine the efficacy and safety of e-cigarette use for smoking cessation. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing nicotine and non-nicotine e-cigarettes (alone, or in combination with behavioural and/or pharmacological interventions) to conventional smoking cessation therapies (pharmacological, behavioural, or both). We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Libraries. Inclusion was restricted to RCTs that reported biochemically validated abstinence at six months or greater. The primary comparison was nicotine e-cigarettes versus any (non-e-cigarette) conventional smoking cessation therapy. Count data were pooled using DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models with inverse variance weighting to obtain relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results A total of six RCTs (n=3,401) were included, with maximum follow-up durations ranging from six to 12 months. Compared with conventional smoking cessation therapies, point estimates favoured nicotine e-cigarettes for the most rigorous criterion of abstinence, continuous abstinence, and point prevalence abstinence, although findings were inconclusive due to wide 95% CIs (Table 1). Similar trends were observed when comparing non-nicotine e-cigarettes to traditional smoking cessation therapies. Compared with non-nicotine e-cigarettes, nicotine e-cigarettes increased abstinence as defined by the most rigorous criterion. Although there was a signal suggesting a potential increased risk of respiratory adverse events with nicotine e-cigarettes versus traditional therapies, the 95% CI is wide. Conclusion E-cigarettes appear to be more efficacious than conventional nicotine pharmacotherapies and behavioural smoking cessation therapies. Although currently available safety data are inconclusive, e-cigarettes may be considered for smoking cessation given the established long-term health consequences of continued smoking. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): Mr. Levett is supported by an Ivan Racheff Scholarship, funded through the McGill University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Research Bursary Program. Dr. Filion is supported by a Senior Research Scholar award from the Fonds de recherche du Québec – Santé and a William Dawson Scholar award from McGill University.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3