Functional stress imaging to predict abnormal coronary fractional flow reserve: the PACIFIC 2 study

Author:

Driessen Roel S1ORCID,van Diemen Pepijn A1,Raijmakers Pieter G2,Knuuti Juhani3,Maaniitty Teemu3ORCID,Underwood S Richard4ORCID,Nagel Eike5ORCID,Robbers Lourens F H J1ORCID,Demirkiran Ahmet1ORCID,von Bartheld Martin B1ORCID,van de Ven Peter M6,Hofstra Leonard17,Somsen G Aernout7,Tulevski Igor I7,Boellaard Ronald2,van Rossum Albert C1ORCID,Danad Ibrahim1,Knaapen Paul1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam , De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam , The Netherlands

2. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam , De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam , The Netherlands

3. Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET and Turku PET Centre, Turku University Hospital , Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, FI-20520 Turku , Finland

4. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Brompton Hospital , Sydney St, London SW3 6NP , UK

5. Institute for Experimental and Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, University Hospital Frankfurt , Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main , Germany

6. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam , De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam , The Netherlands

7. Department of Cardiology, Cardiology Centers of the Netherlands , 1073 TB Amsterdam , The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract Aims The diagnostic performance of non-invasive imaging in patients with prior coronary artery disease (CAD) has not been tested in prospective head-to-head comparative studies. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of qualitative single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), quantitative positron emission tomography (PET), and qualitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with a prior myocardial infarction (MI) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods and results In this prospective clinical study, all patients with prior MI and/or PCI and new symptoms of ischaemic CAD underwent 99mTc-tetrofosmin SPECT, [15O]H2O PET, and MRI, followed by invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve (FFR) in all coronary arteries. All modalities were interpreted by core laboratories. Haemodynamically significant CAD was defined by at least one coronary artery with an FFR ≤0.80. Among the 189 enrolled patients, 63% had significant CAD. Sensitivity was 67% (95% confidence interval 58–76%) for SPECT, 81% (72–87%) for PET, and 66% (56–75%) for MRI. Specificity was 61% (48–72%) for SPECT, 65% (53–76%) for PET, and 62% (49–74%) for MRI. Sensitivity of PET was higher than SPECT (P = 0.016) and MRI (P = 0.014), whereas specificity did not differ among the modalities. Diagnostic accuracy for PET (75%, 68–81%) did not statistically differ from SPECT (65%, 58–72%, P = 0.03) and MRI (64%, 57–72%, P = 0.052). Using FFR < 0.75 as a reference, accuracies increased to 69% (SPECT), 79% (PET), and 71% (MRI). Conclusion In this prospective head-to-head comparative study, SPECT, PET, and MRI did not show a significantly different accuracy for diagnosing FFR defined significant CAD in patients with prior PCI and/or MI. Overall diagnostic performances, however, were discouraging and the additive value of non-invasive imaging in this high-risk population is questionable.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3