Healthy ageing for all? Comparisons of socioeconomic inequalities in health expectancies over two decades in the Cognitive Function and Ageing Studies I and II

Author:

Bennett Holly Q1,Kingston Andrew1,Spiers Gemma1,Robinson Louise1,Corner Lynne1,Bambra Clare1,Brayne Carol2,Matthews Fiona E1,Jagger Carol1

Affiliation:

1. Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK

2. Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

Abstract

Abstract Background Despite increasing life expectancy (LE), cross-sectional data show widening inequalities in disability-free LE (DFLE) by socioeconomic status (SES) in many countries. We use longitudinal data to better understand trends in DFLE and years independent (IndLE) by SES, and how underlying transitions contribute. Methods The Cognitive Function and Ageing Studies (CFAS I and II) are large population-based studies of those aged ≥65 years in three English centres (Newcastle, Nottingham, Cambridgeshire), with baseline around 1991 (CFAS I, n = 7635) and 2011 (CFAS II, n = 7762) and 2-year follow-up. We defined disability as difficulty in activities of daily living (ADL), dependency by combining ADLs and cognition reflecting care required, and SES by area-level deprivation. Transitions between disability or dependency states and death were estimated from multistate models. Results Between 1991 and 2011, gains in DFLE at age 65 were greatest for the most advantaged men and women [men: 4.7 years, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 3.3–6.2; women: 2.8 years, 95% CI 1.3–4.3]. Gains were due to the most advantaged women having a reduced risk of incident disability [relative risk ratio (RRR):0.7, 95% CI 0.5–0.8], whereas the most advantaged men had a greater likelihood of recovery (RRR: 1.8, 95% CI 1.0–3.2) and reduced disability-free mortality risk (RRR: 0.4, 95% CI 0.3–0.6]. Risk of death from disability decreased for least advantaged men (RRR: 0.7, 95% CI 0.6–0.9); least advantaged women showed little improvement in transitions. IndLE patterns across time were similar. Conclusions Prevention should target the most disadvantaged areas, to narrow inequalities, with clear indication from the most advantaged that reduction in poor transitions is achievable.

Funder

Dunhill Medical Trust and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Policy Research Programme

NIHR Older People and Frailty Policy Research Unit

NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care

UK Medical Research Council

Alzheimer’s Society

UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) comprehensive clinical research networks in West Anglia and Trent

Dementias and Neurodegenerative Disease Research Network in Newcastle. MRC CFAS

MRC and the UK National Health Service

Dunhill Medical Trust

Newcastle University Research Fellowship

UK NIHR collaboration for leadership in applied health research and care for Cambridgeshire and Peterborough and the Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre infrastructures

Nottingham city and Nottinghamshire county NHS primary care trusts

UK NIHR Policy Research Programme

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine,Epidemiology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3