The Problem with Crime Problem-Solving: Towards a Second Generation Pop?

Author:

Borrion Hervé1,Ekblom Paul12,Alrajeh Dalal3,Borrion Aiduan Li4,Keane Aidan5,Koch Daniel67,Mitchener-Nissen Timothy8,Toubaline Sonia9

Affiliation:

1. UCL Department of Security and Crime Science, University College London, London, UK

2. Design Against Crime Research Centre, Central Saint Martins, University of the Arts, London, UK

3. Dalal Alrajeh, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK

4. UCL Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, University College London, London, UK

5. School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

6. KTH School of Architecture, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden

7. Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden

8. Timothy Mitchener-Nissen, Trilateral Research, London, UK

9. Université Paris-Dauphine, PSL Research University, Paris, France

Abstract

Abstract In his 2018 Stockholm prize winner lecture, Goldstein highlighted the need for problem-oriented policing (POP) to be not only effective but also fair. Contributing to the development of POP, this study examines how a wider perspective on problem-solving generally, and scoping in particular, can be adopted to address some of the growing challenges in 21st century policing. We demonstrate that the concept of ‘problem’ was too narrowly defined and that, as a result, many problem-solving models found in criminology are ill-structured to minimize the negative side-effects of interventions and deliver broader benefits. Problem-solving concepts and models are compared across disciplines and recommendations are made to improve POP, drawing on examples in architecture, conservation science, industrial ecology and ethics.

Funder

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

Natural Environment Research Council

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Law,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Social Psychology,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference134 articles.

1. Alrajeh, D., Chockler, H. and Halpern, J. (2018), ‘Combining Experts’ Causal Judgments’, in S. A.McIlraith and K. Q.Weinberger, eds., Proceedings of the Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (AAAI-18), AAAI Press, 6311–18.

2. Alrajeh, D., van Lamsweerde, A., Kramer, J., Russo, A. and Uchitel, S. (2016), ‘Risk-Driven Revision of Requirements Models’, in Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering, 855–65. ACM.

3. ‘Land of Strangers’;Amin;Identities,2012

4. ‘Architectural Design as a System of Research Programmes’;Anderson;Design Studies,1984

Cited by 19 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3