Affiliation:
1. Imperial College and CEPR
2. MIT Sloan School of Management, CEPR, and NBER
Abstract
Abstract
How are contracts structured in the presence of relationship-specific investments when legal enforcement is weak? Using a new audit methodology, we show that simple financial contracts in combination with social norms and reputation concerns can sustain relationship-specific transactions. Wholesalers in the market for pens in India use upfront payments rather than increased risk premiums to mitigate risks arising from relationship-specific investments. Upfront payments for printed pens cover only 40 percent of the production costs, highlighting the importance of upfront payments as a screening device. Ex-post, renegotiation is more likely for printed pens, but in a substantial fraction of cases, renegotiation fails.
Funder
Institute for Financial Markets Research in Chennai, India
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference47 articles.
1. Renegotiation Design with Unverifiable Information;Aghion;Econometrica,1994
2. Law, Finance, and Economic Growth in China;Allen;Journal of Financial Economics,2005
3. Poultry in Motion: A Study of International Trade Finance Practices;Antras;Journal of Political Economy,2015
4. Race and Gender Discrimination in Negotiation for the Purchase of a New Car;Ayres;American Economic Review,1995
5. Reputation Effects and the Limits of Contracting: A Study of the Indian Software Industry;Banerjee;Quarterly Journal of Economics,2000