Calling differentially methylated regions from whole genome bisulphite sequencing with DMRcate

Author:

Peters Timothy J12ORCID,Buckley Michael J12,Chen Yunshun34,Smyth Gordon K35,Goodnow Christopher C16,Clark Susan J17ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria St, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia

2. UNSW Sydney, Sydney 2052, Australia

3. The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia

4. Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia

5. School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia

6. School of Medical Sciences and Cellular Genomics Futures Institute, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia

7. St. Vincent’s Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia

Abstract

Abstract Whole genome bisulphite sequencing (WGBS) permits the genome-wide study of single molecule methylation patterns. One of the key goals of mammalian cell-type identity studies, in both normal differentiation and disease, is to locate differential methylation patterns across the genome. We discuss the most desirable characteristics for DML (differentially methylated locus) and DMR (differentially methylated region) detection tools in a genome-wide context and choose a set of statistical methods that fully or partially satisfy these considerations to compare for benchmarking. Our data simulation strategy is both biologically informed—employing distribution parameters derived from large-scale consortium datasets—and thorough. We report DML detection ability with respect to coverage, group methylation difference, sample size, variability and covariate size, both marginally and jointly, and exhaustively with respect to parameter combination. We also benchmark these methods on FDR control and computational time. We use this result to backend and introduce an expanded version of DMRcate: an existing DMR detection tool for microarray data that we have extended to now call DMRs from WGBS data. We compare DMRcate to a set of alternative DMR callers using a similarly realistic simulation strategy. We find DMRcate and RADmeth are the best predictors of DMRs, and conclusively find DMRcate the fastest.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

NHMRC

Bill & Patricia Ritchie Foundation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Genetics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3