Covid-19 and the ‘new normal’: are remote video consultations here to stay?

Author:

Bidmead Elaine1,Marshall Alison1

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Research in Health and Society, Institute of Health, University of Cumbria, Carlisle, Cumbria, UK

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionDuring the UK Covid-19 lockdown, video consultations (telemedicine) were encouraged. The extent of usage, and to which concerns to earlier implementation were set aside, is unknown; this is worthy of exploration as data becomes available.Sources of dataSources of data are as follows: published case studies, editorials, news articles and government guidance.Areas of agreementVideo can be clinically effective, especially where patients cannot attend due to illness or infection risk. Patients are positive, and they can benefit from savings in time and money. Adoption of telemedicine is hindered by a range of known barriers including clinician resistance due to technological problems, disrupted routines, increased workload, decreased work satisfaction and organizational readiness.Areas of controversyDespite policy impetus and successful pilots, telemedicine has not been adopted at scale.Growing pointsIncreased use of telemedicine during the Covid-19 crisis presents opportunities to obtain robust evidence of issues and create service transformation effectively.Areas timely for developing researchExamination of telemedicine use during the Covid-19 crisis to ensure that the benefits and usage continue into the post-lockdown, ‘new normal’ world.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference37 articles.

1. Service user and staff acceptance of fetal ultrasound telemedicine;Bidmead;Digit Health,2020

2. Technology assisted psychiatry—introducing telepsychiatry into an emergency department service;Lange,2017

3. “Teleswallowing”: a case study of remote swallowing assessment;Bidmead;Clin Govern Int J,2015

4. Factors affecting front line staff acceptance of telehealth technologies: a mixed-method systematic review;Brewster;J Adv Nurs,2014

5. Beyond adoption: a new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies;Greenhalgh;J Med Internet Res,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3