Affiliation:
1. Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics and Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, University of Oxford, 16-17 St Ebbes St, Oxford OX1 1PT, UK
Abstract
Abstract
Vaccination decisions and policies present tensions between individual rights and the moral duty to contribute to harm prevention. This article focuses on ethical issues around vaccination behaviour and policies. It will not cover ethical issues around vaccination research.
Sources of data
Literature on ethics of vaccination decisions and policies.
Areas of agreement
Individuals have a moral responsibility to vaccinate, at least against certain infectious diseases in certain circumstances.
Areas of controversy
Some argue that non-coercive measures are ethically preferable unless there are situations of emergency. Others hold that coercive measures are ethically justified even in absence of emergencies.
Growing points
Conscientious objection to vaccination is becoming a major area of discussion.
Areas timely for developing research
The relationship between individual, collective and institutional responsibilities to contribute to the public good of herd immunity will be a major point of discussion, particularly with regard to the COVID-19 vaccine.
Funder
Arts and Humanities Research Council
UKRI
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Cited by
58 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献