The Use of Social Marketing in Community-Wide Physical Activity Programs: A Scoping Review

Author:

Wilson Dawn K1,Sweeney Allison M2,Wippold Guillermo M1,Garcia Kaylyn A1,White Taylor1,Wong Dylan1,Fuller Arianna1,Kitzman Heather3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina , Columbia, SC 29201 , USA

2. Department of Biobehavioral Health and Nursing Science, College of Nursing, University of South Carolina , Columbia, SC , USA

3. Peter O’Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center , Dallas, TX , USA

Abstract

Abstract Background Previous community-wide physical activity trials have been criticized for methodological limitations, lack of population-level changes, and insufficient reach among underserved communities. Social marketing is an effective technique for community-wide behavior change and can coincide with principles of community-based participatory research (CBPR). Purpose A systematic scoping review of community-wide interventions (system-level) targeting physical activity and/or weight loss was conducted to (i) describe and critically discuss how social marketing strategies are implemented; (ii) identify which populations have been targeted, including underserved communities; (iii) evaluate the use of CBPR frameworks; (iv) assess retention rates; and (v) identify gaps in the literature and formulate future recommendations. Methods Eligible studies included those that: aimed to improve physical activity and/or weight loss on a community-wide level, used social marketing strategies, and were published between 2007 and 2022. Results Approximately 56% of the studies reported a positive impact on physical activity. All studies described social marketing details in alignment with the five principles of social marketing (product, promotion, place, price, and people). Only two studies explicitly identified CBPR as a guiding framework, but most studies used one (k = 8, 32%) or two (k = 12, 48%) community engagement strategies. Few studies included at least 50% representation of African American (k = 2) or Hispanic (k = 3) participants. Conclusions This review highlights key gaps in the literature (e.g., lack of fully-developed CBPR frameworks, reach among underserved communities, randomized designs, use of theory), highlights examples of successful interventions, and opportunities for refining community-wide interventions using social marketing strategies.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference56 articles.

1. Group walking as a “lifeline”: Understanding the place of outdoor walking groups in women’s lives;Morris;Soc Sci Med.,2019

2. The results of the “Positive Action for Today’s Health” (PATH) trial for increasing walking and physical activity in underserved African-American Communities;Wilson;Ann Behav Med.,2015

3. Interventions to promote walking: Systematic review;Ogilvie;BMJ.,2007

4. Community wide interventions for increasing physical activity;Baker;Cochrane Database Syst Rev.,2015

5. Inequities and inequalities in outdoor walking groups: a scoping review;Rigby;Public Health Rev.,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3