Affiliation:
1. University of Bern , Switzerland
Abstract
AbstractHow should we respond to moral theories that put excessive demands on individual agents? Intramoral strategies concern the content of morality and set limits on how exacting moral demands may be. Extramoral strategies concern the normative status of morality and set limits on how significant moral demands may be. While both strategies are often discussed separately, I focus on a specific aspect of how they relate to each other: Do intramoral approaches assume that extramoral approaches fail, and if so, does that render them implausible? This challenge becomes apparent when the two strategies are considered together, and my goal is to show how it can be dealt with. In particular, I argue that intramoral strategies do not depend on the failure of extramoral strategies: Even if morality has limited practical significance (which I also doubt), moral theories can be criticised for being too demanding in terms of content.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference41 articles.
1. Supererogation;Archer;Philosophy Compass,2018
2. Moral Limits on the Demands of Beneficence?;Arneson,2004
3. The Demandingness of Scanlon's Contractualism;Ashford;Ethics,2003
4. Epistemic Blame;Boult;Philosophy Compass,2021