On the Age-Old Problem of Dating a Granite: Combined Zircon, Apatite, and Titanite Petrochronology in an I-Type Granite from Mt Stirling, Australia

Abstract

Abstract To address the limitations of current dating methods, it is crucial to not only enhance existing techniques like U–Pb zircon dating but also explore alternative tools. This study focuses on three common mineral phases—zircon, apatite, and titanite—in an I-type granite. The goal is to assess their reliability as dating tools and propose improved methods for dating granitic rocks. In the case study of the Mt Stirling pluton within the Mt Buller igneous suite in Southeastern Australia, significant variability in laser ablation U–Pb zircon ages (around 100 million years) was observed. To improve the reliability of zircon age data and reduce non-magmatic-related variabilities, a data filtering protocol is applied. This protocol involves several steps such as trimming zircons with excessive K and Ca, excluding zircons with unusual core–rim age relationships, removing zircons with excessive non-formula elements (Al, Fe, and Mn), identifying hydrothermally altered zircons, and applying a 10% discordance threshold. The filtered Concordia Age (406 ± 1 Ma; mean square weighted deviation (MSWD) = 0.7, n = 80) of the host rock exhibits improved precision and reduced error compared to the unfiltered data (399 ± 2 Ma; MSWD = 9.3, n = 240). The filtered individual dates show less scatter and a mean that is different (i.e. outside statistical uncertainty), noting that their total still spans a considerable time range of ~50 million years, exceeding the individual zircon analytical reproducibility of 2 standard errors (~15 million years of 2 SE). Caution is advised when using the proposed error for the pooled analyses as a definitive precision. Similarly, trace element filtering approaches were applied to apatite and titanite samples from Mt Stirling, two phases that arguably cannot be inherited. For apatite, monitoring Ca and P as well as Zr/Y and Th/U ratios, along with identifying age groupings based on Sr concentrations, was effective in eliminating outliers and enhancing dating precision. In the case of titanite, monitoring Ca and Ti, Sr/Zr and Sr/Th ratios, and Sr/Ca and Zr/Ti ratios successfully enhanced dating precision. Notably, apatite and titanite grains were grouped in distinct Sr concentrations (high-, mid-, and low-Sr), with these groups corresponding to different date groups: high-Sr apatite and high- and low-Sr titanite returned c. 403 Ma, while low-Sr apatite and mid-Sr titanite returned c. 420 and 393 Ma, respectively. The spuriously younger or older dates may indicate an open system and influences from various common-Pb sources. The 403 Ma date coincides with the filtered zircon data, placing further confidence in the coupled approach, and is interpreted here as the igneous intrusion age. Notable is that this age is 25 Myr older than previously reported K–Ar age data, thus far considered to be the age of the intrusion. This study underscores the potential for erroneous zircon dates due to cryptic chemical influences. To enhance the reliability of age interpretation using laser ablation analyses, employing a petrochronological approach using split-stream combined age and trace element data is recommended in addition to the combination of multiple geochronometers. In the case of Mt Buller, it has proven crucial to carefully verify chemical closure of all applied geochronometers by monitoring concomitant trace element concentrations. Applied to other intrusions, petrochronology can play a critical role in obtaining reliable age information, even for igneous rocks that appear pristine. With this, we emphasise the importance of a careful approach towards individual age data interpretation, which can be produced fast and in abundance with modern analytical approaches.