The Crystallization of Continental Flood Basalt Lavas: Insights from Textural Studies

Abstract

Abstract Continental flood basalt (CFB) provinces are products of the largest known volumetric eruptions on Earth (~104 km3), with individual flow fields commonly covering well over 10 000 km2 with a mean lava thickness of over 5 m. Studies focusing on the emplacement style of such lava flows have relied extensively on morphological observations and comparisons with modern lava flows and experimental analogs. In the present study, we compare the textures of flood basalt lavas with those from different eruption settings all over the world using data collected from pre-existing literature to gain detailed insights into the style of eruption. Comparison of crystal size distribution data indicates that the eruption style of CFBs is similar to those of modern-day fissure eruptions (e.g. Iceland). This matches inferences based on observations of morphology. We also use a 1D thermal model to estimate the depth-dependent cooling rates within a single lava lobe and test the validity of assumptions built into the formulation of these models for large scale flood basalt lavas. The results reveal that, on average, flood basalt lavas need to conductively cool much faster than we would expect (up to order of ~102 times faster) to match the textural observations. The model is also frequently unable to replicate the observed depth-wise relative variations in length with depth for CFB lavas. Furthermore, the calculated cooling rates from crystal shapes also do not match those calculated from crystal lengths, indicating the assumptions in cooling flow models need to be modified for large CFB flow fields. Given the large areas of CFB flow fields and the relatively long eruption times inferred for the emplacement of individual flow fields, we hypothesize that inflation of lobes and formation of new lobes via breakouts combined with variable eruption rates are key processes that are missing when modeling the cooling of these flow fields. Accounting for these processes is essential to derive accurate cooling rates, which is important to better understand the environmental impact CFBs have at the time of emplacement.