Management of refractory disease and persistent symptoms in inflammatory arthritis: qualitative framework analysis of interviews with patients and healthcare professionals

Author:

Chaplin Hema1ORCID,Simpson Carol2,Wilkins Kate2,Meehan Jessica1,Ng Nora3,Galloway James24ORCID,Scott Ian C56ORCID,Sen Debajit78,Tattersall Rachel910,Moss-Morris Rona1,Lempp Heidi2,Norton Sam12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Health Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London , London, UK

2. Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, King’s College London , London, UK

3. Rheumatology Department, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust , London, UK

4. Rheumatology Department, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust , London, UK

5. Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University , Keele, UK

6. Haywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, Haywood Hospital, Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust , Stoke-on-Trent, UK

7. Rheumatology Department, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , London, UK

8. Versus Arthritis Centre for Adolescent Rheumatology, University College London , London, UK

9. Rheumatology Department, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Sheffield, UK

10. Barbara Ansell National Network for Adolescent and Young Adult Rheumatology , UK

Abstract

Abstract Objectives This study aims to explore patients’ and clinicians’ experiences in managing and living with refractory disease (RD) and persistent physical and emotional symptoms (PPES) in patients with RA or polyarticular JIA from their perspectives through interviews and/or focus groups. Methods A qualitative exploration with 25 patients and 32 multidisciplinary rheumatology healthcare professionals (HCPs) was conducted to obtain participants respective understanding and experiences of managing RD/PPES and its impact on the patient–professional relationship. A pragmatic epistemology approach with framework analysis was employed. Results Four key themes were identified from both patients and professionals in the management of RD/PPES: risk/perpetuating factors/triggers; need for a patient-centred holistic approach to care, diagnosis and treatment; discordance and impact on the patient–practitioner relationship and current problems in managing RD/PPES. These themes covered 22 subthemes, with none being patient specific and seven being HCP specific. Suggestions for potential management strategies were highlighted throughout, such as involving other specialties or a multidisciplinary team, assessing/treating patient-reported outcome measures and psychosocial factors, patient (re)education, need for adjustments/aids or adaptations, checking the diagnosis and further investigations/imaging and optimizing medications. Conclusion Management strategies need to be developed that enable appropriate treatment plans for those with RD/PPES that account for wider biopsychosocial factors beyond inflammation and reduce discordance in the patient–practitioner relationship.

Funder

National Institute for Health Research

UK Medical Research Council for the Indigo Partnership

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3