Endoscopic Balloon Dilatation of Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis Strictures in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author:

Dahiya Dushyant Singh1ORCID,Jena Anuraag2,Bapaye Jay3,Mohan Babu P4,Kassab Lena L5,Facciorusso Antonio6,Chandan Saurabh7ORCID,Kochhar Gursimran S8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Motility, The University of Kansas School of Medicine , Kansas City, KS , USA

2. Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research , Chandigarh , India

3. Department of Gastroenterology, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine , Roanoke, VA , USA

4. Orlando Gastroenterology PA , Orlando, FL , USA

5. Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, MN , USA

6. Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Biomedical Science, Foggia University Hospital , Foggia, Puglia , Italy

7. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Creighton University School of Medicine , Omaha, NE , USA

8. Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, Allegheny Health Network , Pittsburgh, PA , USA

Abstract

Abstract Background Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the treatment of choice for medically refractory inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assess outcomes and safety of endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD) for IPAA strictures. Methods A systematic search of numerous databases was performed through June 2023 to identify studies reporting on the outcomes of EBD in pouch-related strictures. Outcomes included technical success, clinical success at index dilation and in pouch retention, recurrence of symptoms post-EBD, and adverse events of EBD. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model, and results were expressed in terms of pooled rates along with relevant 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran Q statistical test with I2 statistics. Results Seven studies with 504 patients were included. The pooled rate of technical success and clinical success of index dilatation was 98.9% (95% CI, 94.8-99.8%; I20%) and 30.2% (95% CI, 7.1-71%; I20%), respectively. The pooled rate of clinical success in pouch retention without the need for additional surgery was 81.4% (95% CI, 69.6-89.3%; I272%). The pooled failure rate of EBD was 18.6% (95% CI, 10.7-30.4%, I272%). The pooled rate of recurrence of symptoms after index dilatation was 58.9% (95% CI, 33.3-80.5%; I213%). The pooled rate of serious adverse events was 1.8% (95% CI, 1-3.5%, I20%). No deaths related to EBD were reported. Conclusions Endoscopic balloon dilatation is safe and highly effective for management of IPAA strictures. Additional studies are needed to compare its efficacy with surgical interventions.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference23 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3