Affiliation:
1. Center for Public Health Nutrition, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Abstract
ABSTRACT
This study explored the characteristics of plant-based beverages (PBBs) that are marketed as “milks” in the United States. First, machine searches of product names and ingredients in the USDA Branded Food Products Database (BFPDB) yielded 641 nondairy PBBs that included almond, soy, coconut, cashew, other tree nut, flax/hemp, pea, and quinoa and rice “milks.” The products varied in energy density and the majority of PBBs contained added salt (69%) and added sugar (53%). Scores on nutrient density metrics [Nutri-Score, Choices, and the Nutrient Rich Food index 7.3 (NRF7.3)] were higher for almond and pea products and lower for coconut PBBs, which contained saturated fat. Ingredient lists were searched further for added flavors, stabilizers, or preservatives said to be characteristic of the NOVA food classification system's ultra-processed group. Most PBBs (90.1%) and 95% of almond milks met the NOVA criteria for ultra-processed foods, because they were created from food components and contained multiple substances not used in normal cooking. Replacing milk and dairy products with plant-based alternatives will necessarily involve the use of ultra-processed foods.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous),Food Science
Reference61 articles.
1. Ultra-processed foods: what they are and how to identify them;Monteiro;Public Health Nutr,2019
2. The UN Decade of Nutrition, the NOVA food classification and the trouble with ultra-processing;Monteiro;Public Health Nutr,2018
3. Characterizing ultra-processed foods by energy density, nutrient density, and cost;Gupta;Front Nutr,2019
4. Characterizing percentage energy from ultra-processed foods by participant demographics, diet quality and diet cost: findings from the Seattle Obesity Study (SOS) III;Gupta;Br J Nutr,2020
Cited by
31 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献