Affiliation:
1. Department of Critical Care Medicine and Hospital Infection Prevention and Control, Shenzhen Second People’s Hospital & First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University , Shenzhen 518035, China
2. Postgraduate Education, Shantou University Medical College , Shantou 515041, China
3. Capital Medical University Department of Central Laboratory, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, , Beijing 100026, China
4. Trauma Research Center, Medical Innovation Research Department and Fourth Medical Center of the Chinese PLA General Hospital , Beijing 100048, China
5. Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine , Nanning 530200, China
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Minimal data exist on anticoagulation use and timing and the dose of heparin in patients with sepsis, and whether heparin use improves sepsis survival remains largely unclear. This study was performed to assess whether heparin administration would provide a survival advantage in critically ill patients with sepsis.
Methods
A retrospective cohort study of patients with sepsis in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database was conducted. Cox proportional hazards model and propensity score matching (PSM) were used to evaluate the outcomes of prophylactic anticoagulation with heparin administered by subcutaneous injection within 48 h of intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included 60-day mortality, length of ICU stay, length of hospital stay and incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) on day 7. E-Value analysis were used for unmeasured confounding.
Results
A total of 6646 adult septic patients were included and divided into an early prophylactic heparin group (n = 3211) and a nonheparin group (n = 3435). In-hospital mortality in the heparin therapy group was significantly lower than that in the nonheparin group (prematched 14.7 vs 20.0%, hazard ratio (HR) 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.68–0.87], p < 0.001, and postmatched 14.9 vs 18.3%, HR 0.78, 95% CI [0.68–0.89], p < 0.001). Secondary endpoints, including 60-day mortality and length of ICU stay, differed between the heparin and nonheparin groups (p < 0.01). Early prophylactic heparin administration was associated with in-hospital mortality among septic patients in different adjusted covariates (HR 0.71–0.78, p < 0.001), and only administration of five doses of heparin was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality after PSM (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56–0.87, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that heparin use was significantly associated with reduced in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy, septic shock, sequential organ failure assessment score ≥ 10, AKI, mechanical ventilation, gram-positive bacterial infection and gram-negative bacterial infection, with HRs of 0.74, 0.70, 0.58, 0.74, 0.73, 0.64 and 0.72, respectively (p <0.001). E-Value analysis suggested robustness to unmeasured confounding.
Conclusions
This study found an association between early administration prophylactic heparin provided to patients with sepsis and reduced risk-adjusted mortality. A prospective randomized-controlled study should be designed to further assess the relevant findings.
Funder
Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen
Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission
Shenzhen Second People’s Hospital Clinical Research Fund of Guangdong Province High-level Hospital Construction Project
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Dermatology,Biomedical Engineering,Emergency Medicine,Immunology and Allergy,Surgery