Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis practice and its association with outcomes in Australia and New Zealand burns patients

Author:

Tracy Lincoln M1ORCID,Cameron Peter A12,Singer Yvonne13,Earnest Arul45,Wood Fiona6,Cleland Heather13,Gabbe Belinda J17

Affiliation:

1. School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia

2. Emergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia

3. Victorian Adult Burns Service, Alfred Hospital, 55 Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia, Australia

4. Registry Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia

5. Biostatistics Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia

6. Burn Injury Research Unit, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Perth, Western Australia, 6009, Australia

7. Health Data Research UK, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, UK

Abstract

Abstract Background Patients with burn injuries are considered to have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). While untreated VTEs can be fatal, no studies have examined chemoprophylaxis effectiveness. This study aimed to quantify the variation in prevalence of VTE prophylaxis use in patients in Australian and New Zealand burns units and whether prophylaxis use is associated with in-hospital outcomes following burn injury. Methods Admission data for adult burns patients (aged ≥16 years) admitted between 1 July 2016 and 31 December 2018 were extracted from the Burns Registry of Australia and New Zealand. Mixed effects logistic regression modelling investigated whether VTE prophylaxis use was associated with the primary outcome of in-hospital mortality. Results There were 5066 admissions over the study period. Of these patients, 81% (n = 3799) with a valid response to the VTE prophylaxis data field received some form of VTE prophylaxis. Use of VTE prophylaxis ranged from 48.6% to 94.8% of patients between units. In-hospital death was recorded in <1% of patients (n = 33). After adjusting for confounders, receiving VTE prophylaxis was associated with a decrease in the adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio = 0.21; 95% CI, 0.07–0.63; p = 0.006). Conclusions Variation in the use of VTE prophylaxis was observed between the units, and prophylaxis use was associated with a decrease in the odds of mortality. These findings provide an opportunity to engage with units to further explore differences in prophylaxis use and develop future best practice guidelines.

Funder

Australian and New Zealand Burn Association

Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care

Julian Burton Burns Trust

Helen Macpherson Smith Trust

Thyne Reid Foundation

Australasian Foundation for Plastic Surgery

New Zealand Accident Compensation Corporation

Clipsal by Schnieder Electric National Community Grants Program

HCF Research Foundation

Australian Research Council Future Fellowship

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Dermatology,Biomedical Engineering,Emergency Medicine,Immunology and Allergy,Surgery

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3