Combining Inserts With Warning Labels on Cigarette Packs to Promote Smoking Cessation: A 2-Week Randomized Trial

Author:

Thrasher James F1ORCID,Ferguson Stuart G2,Hackworth Emily E1,Wu Chung-Li3,Lambert Victoria C1,Porticella Norman4,Kim Minji1ORCID,Hardin James W3,Niederdeppe Jeff4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Promotion, Education & Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina , Columbia, SC , USA

2. College of Health & Medicine, University of Tasmania , Hobart , Australia

3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina , Columbia, SC , USA

4. Jeb E. Brooks School of Public Policy and Department of Communication, Cornell University , Ithaca, NY , USA

Abstract

Abstract Background Cigarette pack inserts with messages on cessation benefits and advice are a promising labeling policy that may help promote smoking cessation. Purpose To assess insert effects, with and without accompanying pictorial health warning labels(HWLs), on hypothesized psychosocial and behavioral outcomes. Methods We conducted a 2 × 2 between-subject randomized trial (inserts with efficacy messages vs. no inserts; large pictorial HWLs vs. small text HWLs), with 367 adults who smoked at least 10 cigarettes a day. Participants received a 14-day supply of their preferred cigarettes with packs modified to reflect their experimental condition. Over 2 weeks, we surveyed participants approximately 4–5 times a day during their smoking sessions, querying feelings about smoking, level of worry about harms from smoking, self-efficacy to cut down on cigarettes, self-efficacy to quit, hopefulness about quitting, and motivation to quit. Each evening, participants reported their perceived susceptibility to smoking harms and, for the last 24 hr, their frequency of thinking about smoking harms and cessation benefits, conversations about smoking cessation or harms, and foregoing or stubbing out cigarettes before they finished smoking. Mixed-effects ordinal and logistic models were estimated to evaluate differences between groups. Results Participants whose packs included inserts were more likely than those whose packs did not include inserts to report foregoing or stubbing out of cigarettes (OR = 2.39, 95% CI = 1.36, 4.20). Otherwise, no statistically significant associations were found between labeling conditions and outcomes. Conclusions This study provides some evidence, albeit limited, that pack inserts with efficacy messages can promote behaviors that predict smoking cessation attempts.

Funder

National Cancer Institute

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,General Psychology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3