Evidence that Mental Contrasting Reduces Health Information Avoidance

Author:

Yang Michelle Z1,King Willa C1,Oettingen Gabriele2,Sheeran Paschal13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, NC , USA

2. Department of Psychology, New York University , New York, NY , USA

3. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center , Chapel Hill, NC , USA

Abstract

Abstract Background Although learning health information is beneficial for physical well-being, many people opt to avoid learning this information due to its potentially threatening nature. Such avoidance can lead to delays in seeking treatment. Purpose This study tested the effectiveness of a self-regulation technique, mental contrasting (MC), specifically MC of a negative future with a positive current reality, in reducing health information avoidance regarding skin cancer (melanoma). We hypothesized that participants who engaged in MC would be more likely to choose to learn about their melanoma risk than those who completed a control, reflection activity. Methods We conducted a randomized controlled trial (N = 354). Participants were assigned to complete a MC or reflection (control) exercise prior to filling out a melanoma risk calculator. Participants were then asked whether they wanted to learn their melanoma risk, and how much information they would like to know. Results Chi-Square tests revealed that MC decreased melanoma risk information avoidance compared to the reflection activity (12% vs. 23.4%) but did not make participants more likely seek additional information. Conclusion MC is a brief, engaging, and effective strategy for reducing health information avoidance that could prove useful in medical settings.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,General Psychology

Reference34 articles.

1. Does monitoring goal progress promote goal attainment? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence;Harkin;Psychol Bull.,2016

2. Cancer screening prevalence and associated factors among US adults;Ma;Prev Chronic Dis.,2022

3. Adults who have never been screened for colorectal cancer, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2012 and 2020;Richardson;Prev Chronic Dis.,2022

4. Barriers to cancer screening;Womeodu;Med Clin,1996

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3