The suitability of micronuclei as markers of relative biological effect

Author:

Heaven Charlotte J12,Wanstall Hannah C23ORCID,Henthorn Nicholas T12,Warmenhoven John-William12,Ingram Samuel P14,Chadwick Amy L1ORCID,Santina Elham1,Honeychurch Jamie1,Schmidt Christine K1,Kirkby Karen J12,Kirkby Norman F12,Burnet Neil G2,Merchant Michael J12

Affiliation:

1. Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, M13 9PL Manchester, United Kingdom

2. Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, M20 4BX Manchester, United Kingdom

3. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Faculty of Science and Engineering, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, M13 9PL Manchester, United Kingdom

4. Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, M20 4BX Manchester, United Kingdom

Abstract

Abstract Micronucleus (MN) formation is routinely used as a biodosimeter for radiation exposures and has historically been used as a measure of DNA damage in cells. Strongly correlating with dose, MN are also suggested to indicate radiation quality, differentiating between particle and photon irradiation. The “gold standard” for measuring MN formation is Fenech’s cytokinesis-block micronucleus (CBMN) cytome assay, which uses the cytokinesis blocking agent cytochalasin-B. Here, we present a comprehensive analysis of the literature investigating MN induction trends in vitro, collating 193 publications, with 2476 data points. Data were collected from original studies that used the CBMN assay to quantify MN in response to ionizing radiation in vitro. Overall, the meta-analysis showed that individual studies mostly have a linear increase of MN with dose [85% of MN per cell (MNPC) datasets and 89% of percentage containing MN (PCMN) datasets had an R2 greater than 0.90]. However, there is high variation between studies, resulting in a low R2 when data are combined (0.47 for MNPC datasets and 0.60 for PCMN datasets). Particle type, species, cell type, and cytochalasin-B concentration were suggested to influence MN frequency. However, variation in the data meant that the effects could not be strongly correlated with the experimental parameters investigated. There is less variation between studies when comparing the PCMN rather than the number of MNPC. Deviation from CBMN protocol specified timings did not have a large effect on MN induction. However, further analysis showed less variation between studies following Fenech’s protocol closely, which provided more reliable results. By limiting the cell type and species as well as only selecting studies following the Fenech protocol, R2 was increased to 0.64 for both measures. We therefore determine that due to variation between studies, MN are currently a poor predictor of radiation-induced DNA damage and make recommendations for futures studies assessing MN to improve consistency between datasets.

Funder

NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre

STFC Global Challenge Network+ in Advanced Radiotherapy

European Union Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation

United Kingdom Engineering and Physical Science Research Council

Cockcroft Institute of Science and Technology/ASTeC STFC core

EPSRC Grand Challenge Network+ in Proton Therapy

Medical Research Council

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Genetics (clinical),Toxicology,Genetics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3