Follow-up genotoxicity assessment of Ames-positive/equivocal chemicals using the improved thymidine kinase gene mutation assay in DNA repair-deficient human TK6 cells

Author:

Sassa Akira1ORCID,Fukuda Takayuki2,Ukai Akiko3,Nakamura Maki2,Sato Ryosuke2,Fujiwara Sho2,Hirota Kouji4,Takeda Shunichi5ORCID,Sugiyama Kei-ichi3,Honma Masamitsu3,Yasui Manabu3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biology, Graduate School of Science, Chiba University, 1-33 Yayoi-cho, Inage-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba 263-8522, Japan

2. Tokyo Laboratory, BoZo Research Center Inc., 1-3-11, Hanegi, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 156-0042, Japan

3. Division of Genetics and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Health Sciences, 3-25-26 Tonomachi, Kawasaki-ku, Kawasaki 210-9501, Japan

4. Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 1-1 Minami-Ohsawa, Hachioji-shi, Tokyo, Japan

5. Department of Radiation Genetics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Yoshida Konoe, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan

Abstract

Abstract Genotoxicity testing plays an important role in the safety assessment of pharmaceuticals, pesticides and chemical substances. Among the guidelines for various genotoxicity tests, the in vitro genotoxicity test battery comprises the bacterial Ames test and mammalian cell assays. Several chemicals exhibit conflicting results for the bacterial Ames test and mammalian cell genotoxicity studies, which may stem from the differences in DNA repair capacity or metabolism, between different cell types or species. For better understanding the mechanistic implications regarding conflict outcomes between different assay systems, it is necessary to develop in vitro genotoxicity testing approaches with higher specificity towards DNA-damaging reagents. We have recently established an improved thymidine kinase (TK) gene mutation assay (TK assay) i.e. deficient in DNA excision repair system using human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells lacking XRCC1 and XPA (XRCC1−/−/XPA−/−), the core factors of base excision repair (BER) and nucleotide excision repair (NER), respectively. This DNA repair-deficient TK6 cell line is expected to specifically evaluate the genotoxic potential of chemical substances based on the DNA damage. We focussed on four reagents, N-(1-naphthyl)ethylenediamine dihydrochloride (NEDA), p-phenylenediamine (PPD), auramine and malachite green (MG) as the Ames test-positive chemicals. In our assay, assessment using XRCC1−/−/XPA−/− cells revealed no statistically significant increase in the mutant frequencies after treatment with NEDA, PPD and MG, suggesting the chemicals to be non-genotoxic in humans. The observations were consistent with that of the follow-up in vivo studies. In contrast, the mutant frequency was markedly increased in XRCC1−/−/XPA−/− cells after treatment with auramine. The results suggest that auramine is the genotoxic reagent that preferentially induces DNA damages resolved by BER and/or NER in mammals. Taken together, BER/NER-deficient cell-based genotoxicity testing will contribute to elucidate the mechanism of genotoxicity and therefore play a pivotal role in the accurate safety assessment of chemical substances.

Funder

Japan Chemical Industry Association

Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Genetics(clinical),Toxicology,Genetics

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3