Benchmark dose analysis of multiple genotoxicity endpoints in gpt delta mice exposed to aristolochic acid I

Author:

Chen Ruixue1,You Xinyue1ORCID,Cao Yiyi1,Masumura Kenichi2,Ando Tomoko2,Hamada Shuichi3,Horibata Katsuyoshi2,Wan Jingjing1,Xi Jing1,Zhang Xinyu1,Honma Masamitsu2,Luan Yang1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Public Health, Hongqiao International Institute of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

2. Division of Genetics and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Health Sciences, Tonomachi, Kawasaki-ku, Kawasaki City, Kanagawa, Japan

3. Tokyo Laboratory BoZo Research Center Inc., Hanegi, Setagaya, Tokyo, Japan

Abstract

Abstract As the carcinogenic risk of herbs containing aristolochic acids (AAs) is a global health issue, quantitative evaluation of toxicity is needed for the regulatory decision-making and risk assessment of AAs. In this study, we selected AA I (AAI), the most abundant and representative compound in AAs, to treat transgenic gpt delta mice at six gradient doses ranging from 0.125 to 4 mg/kg/day for 28 days. AAI-DNA adduct frequencies and gpt gene mutation frequencies (MFs) in the kidney, as well as Pig-a gene MFs and micronucleated reticulocytes (MN-RETs) frequencies in peripheral blood, were monitored. The dose–response (DR) relationship data for these in vivo genotoxicity endpoints were quantitatively evaluated using an advanced benchmark dose (BMD) approach with different critical effect sizes (CESs; i.e., BMD5, BMD10, BMD50 and BMD100). The results showed that the AAI-DNA adduct frequencies, gpt MFs and the MN-RETs presented good DR relationship to the administrated doses, and the corresponding BMDL100 (the lower 90% confidence interval of the BMD100) values were 0.017, 0.509 and 3.9 mg/kg/day, respectively. No positive responses were observed in the Pig-a MFs due to bone marrow suppression caused by AAI. Overall, we quantitatively evaluated the genotoxicity of AAI at low doses for multiple endpoints for the first time. Comparisons of BMD100 values across different endpoints provide a basis for the risk assessment and regulatory decision-making of AAs and are also valuable for understanding the genotoxicity mechanism of AAs.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai

Shanghai Municipal Health Commission Scientific Research Project

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Genetics(clinical),Toxicology,Genetics

Reference47 articles.

1. Final report on carcinogens background document for aristolochic acids;National Toxicology Program;Rep. Carcinog. Backgr. Doc.,2008

2. Preventing aristolochic acid nephropathy;Anandagoda;Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,,2015

3. Risk assessment of plant food supplements and other herbal products containing aristolochic acids using the margin of exposure (MOE) approach;Abdullah;Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control Expo. Risk Assess.,,2017

4. Ancient medicinal use of Aristolochia: birthwort’s tradition and toxicity;Scarborough;Pharm. Hist.,,2011

5. Aristolochic acid nephropathy: a worldwide problem;Debelle;Kidney Int.,,2008

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3