In vitro and integrated in vivo strategies to reduce animal use in genotoxicity testing

Author:

Groff Katherine1,Evans Stephen J2,Doak Shareen H2,Pfuhler Stefan3,Corvi Raffaella4,Saunders Samantha1,Stoddart Gilly1

Affiliation:

1. PETA Science Consortium International e.V., Stuttgart, Germany

2. Institute of Life Science, Swansea University, UK

3. Procter & Gamble Co., Mason, OH, USA

4. European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy

Abstract

Abstract Abstract Scientific, financial, and ethical drivers have led to unprecedented interest in implementing human-relevant, mechanistic in vitro and in silico testing approaches. Further, as non-animal approaches are being developed and validated, researchers are interested in strategies that can immediately reduce the use of animals in toxicology testing. Here, we aim to outline a testing strategy for assessing genotoxicity beginning with standard in vitro methods, such as the bacterial reverse mutation test and the in vitro micronucleus test, followed by a second tier of in vitro assays including those using advanced 3D tissue models. Where regulatory agencies require in vivo testing, one demonstrated strategy is to combine genotoxicity studies traditionally conducted separately into a single test or to integrate genotoxicity studies into other toxicity studies. Standard setting organisations and regulatory agencies have encouraged such strategies, and examples of their use can be found in the scientific literature. Employing approaches outlined here will reduce animal use as well as study time and costs.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Genetics (clinical),Toxicology,Genetics

Reference91 articles.

1. Americans hold record liberal views on most moral issues;Jones;Gallup,2017

2. Public attitudes to animal research in 2016;Clemence;Ipsos MORI,,2016

3. Retrospective analysis of the Draize test for serious eye damage/eye irritation: importance of understanding the in vivo endpoints under UN GHS/EU CLP for the development and evaluation of in vitro test methods;Adriaens;Arch. Toxicol.,,2014

4. Analysis of Draize eye irritation testing and its prediction by mining publicly available 2008–2014 REACH data;Luechtefeld;ALTEX,,2016

5. A strategic roadmap for establishing new approaches to evaluate the safety of chemicals and medical products in the United States;Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM),2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3