In vitro evaluation of the accuracy of electronic apex locators and cone-beam CT in the detection of oblique root fractures

Abstract

Abstract Objectives This study aimed to compare the accuracy of cone-beam CT (CBCT) scanning and 3 different electronic apex locators (EALs) in the detection of simulated oblique root fractures (ORF) in different localizations. Methods The study utilised a total of 80 human maxillary incisors, which were categorised into two groups based on the location of the ORF (apical and middle third of the root) formed on the buccal side of the root surface. The measurement of the distance between the incisal edge and the intersection of the ORF with the root canal was conducted using a stereomicroscope. This measurement is referred to as the actual working length (AWL). Additionally, three EALs—Dentaport ZX, EndoRadar Pro, and Propex II—were utilised to determine the electronic working length (EWL). Furthermore, CBCT images were employed to assess the distance, known as the CBCT working length (CWL). The differences were determined by subtracting AWL from EWL and CWL. Results Based on the accuracy of the devices, there were no significant differences observed among Dentaport ZX, EndoRadar, Propex II, and CBCT measures in both the apical and middle third ORF groups, within the acceptable range of 0.5 and 1 mm. Conclusions The accuracy of Dentaport ZX, Propex II, and CBCT was higher in the middle third ORF group compared to the apical third ORF group, with a tolerance of 0.5 mm. However, there were no significant differences seen among the devices.