Ultra-low-dose photon-counting CT of paranasal sinus: an in vivo comparison of radiation dose and image quality to cone-beam CT

Author:

Kaatsch Hanns Leonhard1,Fulisch Florian1,Dillinger Daniel2,Kubitscheck Laura13,Becker Benjamin V14,Piechotka Joel1,Brockmann Marc A4,Froelich Matthias F5,Schoenberg Stefan O5,Overhoff Daniel15,Waldeck Stephan14

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Bundeswehr Central Hospital Koblenz , Koblenz 56072, Germany

2. Department of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Surgery, Bundeswehr Central Hospital , Koblenz 56072, Germany

3. Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology affiliated to Ulm University , Munich 80937, Germany

4. Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Mainz , Mainz 55131, Germany

5. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim , Mannheim 68167, Germany

Abstract

Abstract Purpose This study investigated the differences in subjective and objective image parameters as well as dose exposure of photon-counting CT (PCCT) compared to cone-beam CT (CBCT) in paranasal sinus imaging for the assessment of rhinosinusitis and sinonasal anatomy. Methods This single-centre retrospective study included 100 patients, who underwent either clinically indicated PCCT or CBCT of the paranasal sinus. Two blinded experienced ENT radiologists graded image quality and delineation of specific anatomical structures on a 5-point Likert scale. In addition, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and applied radiation doses were compared among both techniques. Results Image quality and delineation of bone structures in paranasal sinus PCCT was subjectively rated superior by both readers compared to CBCT (P < .001). CNR was significantly higher for photon-counting CT (P < .001). Mean effective dose for PCCT examinations was significantly lower than for CBCT (0.038 mSv ± 0.009 vs. 0.14 mSv ± 0.011; P < .001). Conclusion In a performance comparison of PCCT and a modern CBCT scanner in paranasal sinus imaging, we demonstrated that first-use PCCT in clinical routine provides higher subjective image quality accompanied by higher CNR at close to a quarter of the dose exposure compared to CBCT.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3