Comparison of QuantiFERON Gold In-Tube Versus Tuberculin Skin Tests on the Initiation of Tuberculosis Preventive Therapy Among Patients Newly Diagnosed With Human Immunodeficiency Virus in the North West Province of South Africa (the Teko Study): A Cluster Randomized Trial

Author:

Jarrett Brooke A1ORCID,Shearer Kate2,Motlhaoleng Katlego3,Chon Sandy2,Letuba Gaolaolwe Gabriel3,Qomfo Cokiswa3,Moulton Lawrence H24,Cohn Silvia2,Lebina Limakatso3,Chaisson Richard E24,Variava Ebrahim5,Martinson Neil A23,Golub Jonathan E124

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore, Maryland , USA

2. Center for Tuberculosis Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore Maryland , USA

3. Perinatal HIV Research Unit, The University of the Witwatersrand , Soweto , South Africa

4. Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore, Maryland , USA

5. Department of Internal Medicine, Klerksdorp–Tshepong Hospital Complex , Klerksdorp , South Africa

Abstract

Abstract Background Tuberculosis (TB) preventive therapy (TPT) reduces the risk of TB disease in people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), yet uptake has been suboptimal in many countries. We assessed whether QuantiFERON Gold In-Tube (QGIT) during routine HIV care increased TB infection (TBI) testing and TPT prescriptions. Methods This parallel-arm, 1:1 cluster-randomized controlled trial compared the standard-of-care tuberculin skin test to QGIT in South Africa. We enrolled consenting, TPT-eligible adults diagnosed with HIV ≤30 days prior and used intention-to-treat analyses for the outcomes: proportion of patients with documented TBI results, proportion with documented TPT, and time from enrollment to outcomes. Findings We enrolled 2232 patients across 14 clinics from November 2014 to May 2017 (58% in intervention clinics). At 24 months of follow-up, more participants in intervention clinics had TBI results (69% vs 2%, P < .001) and TPT prescriptions (45% vs 30%, P = .13) than control clinics. Controlling for baseline covariates, intervention clinics had 60% (95% confidence interval, 51–68; P < .001) more participants with TBI results and 12% (95% confidence interval, −6 to 31; P = .18) more with TPT prescriptions. Among participants with results, those in intervention clinics received results and TPT faster (intervention: median of 6 and 29 days after enrollment vs control: 21 and 54 days, respectively). Interpretation In this setting, QGIT in routine HIV care resulted in more patients with TBI results. Clinicians also initiated more people with HIV on TPT in QGIT intervention clinics, and did so more quickly, than the control arm. Clinical Trials Registration NCT02119130.

Funder

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

National Institute of Mental Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3