Agnogenic practices and corporate political strategy: the legitimation of UK gambling industry-funded youth education programmes

Author:

van Schalkwyk May C I1ORCID,Hawkins Benjamin2,Petticrew Mark3,Maani Nason4ORCID,Garde Amandine5,Reeves Aaron6,McKee Martin1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine , 15-17 Tavistock Pl, London WC1H 9SH , UK

2. MRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge , Cambrdige CB2 0SL , UK

3. Department of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine , 15-17 Tavistock Pl, London WC1H 9SH , UK

4. Global Health Policy Unit, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh Chrystal Macmillan Building 15a George Square , Edinburgh EH8 9LD , UK

5. Law & NCD Unit, School of Law and Social Justice, University of Liverpool , Liverpool L69 7ZR , UK

6. Department of Social Policy and Intervention, Barnett House, 32 -37 Wellington Square, University of Oxford , Oxford OX1 2ER, UK

Abstract

Abstract Agnogenic practices—designed to create ignorance or doubt—are well-established strategies employed by health-harming industries (HHI). However, little is known about their use by industry-funded organizations delivering youth education programmes. We applied a previously published framework of corporate agnogenic practices to analyse how these organizations used them in three UK gambling industry-funded youth education programmes. Evidential strategies adopted previously by other HHI are prominent in the programmes’ practitioner-facing materials, evaluation design and reporting and in public statements about the programmes. We show how agnogenic practices are employed to portray these youth education programmes as ‘evidence-based’ and ‘evaluation-led’. These practices distort the already limited evidence on these educational initiatives while legitimizing industry-favourable policies, which prioritize commercial interests over public health. Given the similarities in political strategies adopted by different industries, these findings are relevant to research and policy on other HHI.

Funder

National Institute for Health Research

NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North Thames

UK Prevention Research Partnership

Medical Research Council

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

Economic and Social Research Council

Natural Environment Research Council

British Heart Foundation

Cancer Research UK

Wellcome Trust

Health Foundation

Government: Scottish Government Chief Scientist Office

Health and Care Research Wales

Public Health Agency

London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Ethics Committee

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health (social science)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3