Including health impacts in environmental impact assessments for three Australian coal-mining projects: a documentary analysis

Author:

Riley Emily1,Sainsbury Peter2,McManus Phil3,Colagiuri Ruth1,Viliani Francesca4,Dawson Angus5,Duncan Elizabeth3,Stone Yolande6,Pham Tracy1,Harris Patrick1

Affiliation:

1. Level 2 The Hub, Charles Perkins Centre D17, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia

2. School of Public Health, The University of Sydney

3. School of Geosciences, University of Sydney

4. International SOS, Denmark Office, Copenhagen, Denmark

5. Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Level 1, Medical Foundation Building K25, NSW 2006, Australia

6. Stonecorp Pty Ltd, Mosman 2088, Australia

Abstract

Abstract Notwithstanding the historical benefits of coal in aiding human and economic development, the negative health and environmental impacts of coal extraction and processing are of increasing concern. Environmental impact assessments (EIAs) are a regulated policy mechanism that can be used to predict and consider the health impacts of mining projects to determine if consent is given. The ways in which health is considered within EIA is unclear. This research investigated ‘How and to what extent are health, well-being and equity issues considered in Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) of major coal mining projects in New South Wales, Australia’. To this end we developed and applied a comprehensive coding framework designed to interrogate the publicly available environmental impact statements (EISs) of three mines in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, for their inclusion of health, well-being and equity issues. Analysis of the three EISs demonstrates that: the possible impacts of each mine on health and well-being were narrowly and inadequately considered; when health and well-being were considered there was a failure to assess the possible impacts specific to the particular mine and the communities potentially affected; the cumulative impacts on human health of multiple mines in the same geographical area were almost completely ignored; the discussions of intragenerational and intergenerational equity did not demonstrate a sound understanding of equity and, it is essential that governments’ requirements for the EIA include detailed analysis of the health, well-being, equity and cumulative impacts specific to the proposed mine and relevant communities.

Funder

Sydney Policy Lab

The University of Sydney

Australian National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health(social science)

Reference31 articles.

1. Environmental change and human health in Upper Hunter communities of New South Wales, Australia;Connor;EcoHealth,2004

2. Healthy public in all policies;De Leeuw;Health Promotion International,2011

3. Analysing Discourse

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3