Systematic review of health literacy champions: who, what and how?

Author:

Ayre Julie1ORCID,Zhang Michael1,Mouwad Dana2ORCID,Zachariah Dipti3,McCaffery Kirsten J1ORCID,Muscat Danielle M1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab , Sydney, NSW , Australia

2. Health Literacy Hub, Western Sydney Local Health District , Sydney, NSW , Australia

3. Multicultural Health, Western Sydney Local Health District , Sydney, NSW , Australia

Abstract

Abstract Health literacy is an important aspect of equitable, safe, and high-quality care. For organizations implementing health literacy initiatives, using ‘change champions’ appears to be a promising strategy. This systematic review aimed to identify the empirical and conceptual research that exists about health literacy champions. We conducted the systematic literature search using MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and PubMed, with additional studies identified by searching references and citations of included studies and reviews of organizational health literacy. Seventeen articles were included in the final review (case studies, n = 9; qualitative research, n = 4; quasi-experimental, n = 2; opinion articles without case studies, n = 2). Using JBI critical appraisal tools, most articles had a high risk of bias. Often champions were not the focus of the article. Champions included staff across frontline, management, and executive levels. Only five studies described training for champions. Key champion activities related to either (i) increasing organizational awareness and commitment to health literacy, or (ii) influencing organizational strategic and operational planning. The most common output was ensuring that the organization’s health information materials met health literacy guidelines. Articles recommended engaging multiple champions at varying levels within the organization, including the executive level. Limited funding and resources were key barriers. Two of four articles reported positive impacts of champions on implementation of health literacy initiatives. Overall, few of the articles described health literacy champions in adequate detail. More comprehensive reporting on this implementation strategy and further experimental and process evaluation research are needed to progress this area of research. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022348816).

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health (social science)

Reference43 articles.

1. Becoming a health literate organization: formative research results from healthcare organizations providing care for undeserved communities;Adsul;Health Services Management Research,2017

2. Building health literacy responsiveness in Melbourne’s west: a systems approach;Allott;Australian Health Review,2018

3. Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review;Berkman;Annals of Internal Medicine,2011

4. Considering bias and conflicts of interest among the included studies;Boutron;Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions,2019

5. The journey to become a health literate organization: a snapshot of health system improvement;Brach;Studies in Health Technology and Informatics,2017

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The year in review—Health Promotion International 2023;Health Promotion International;2024-01-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3