Applying intersectionality theory in health promotion research and practice

Author:

Heard Emma1ORCID,Fitzgerald Lisa1,Wigginton Britta1ORCID,Mutch Allyson1

Affiliation:

1. School of Public Health, University of Queensland, 266 Herston Rd, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia

Abstract

Abstract Health promotion researchers and practitioners are grappling with how to address growing health inequalities for population groups. In particular, critiques of dominant behaviour change approaches draw attention to the need to engage with social theories to better understand the social and relational drivers of health. Public health researchers are increasingly acknowledging intersectionality as an important theoretical approach, providing a framework for investigating health inequalities by highlighting intersections of individuals’ multiple identities within social systems of power that compound and exacerbate experiences of ill health. This article provides an overview of the diverse ways public health researchers and practitioners have applied intersectionality theory to better understand and address health inequalities. We map three key applications of intersectionality theory in public health: as an epistemological approach, as a methodological approach, and as a tool for action and intervention. Drawing on this work, we argue that health promotion researchers and practitioners can enhance engagement with intersectionality theory to address important challenges within the field. Through this article, we aim to inspire the continued exploration of intersectionality and offer some insights into opportunities and challenges for doing so in health promotion.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health(social science)

Reference58 articles.

1. Capitals and capabilities: linking structure and agency to reduce health inequalities;Abel;Social Science and Medicine,2012

2. Inter-categorical intersectionality and leisure-based physical activity in Canada;Abichahine;Health Promotion International,2017

3. Health care barriers, racism, and intersectionality in Australia;Bastos;Social Science & Medicine (1982),2018

4. Incorporating intersectionality theory into population health research methodology: challenges and the potential to advance health equity;Bauer;Social Science & Medicine,2014

5. Why behavioural health promotion endures despite its failure to reduce health inequities;Baum;Sociology of Health & Illness,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3