Mapping complex public health problems with causal loop diagrams

Author:

Uleman Jeroen F1ORCID,Stronks Karien2,Rutter Harry3,Arah Onyebuchi A4567ORCID,Rod Naja Hulvej1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Public Health, Copenhagen Health Complexity Center, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen, Denmark

2. Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam, The Netherlands

3. Department of Social and Policy Sciences, University of Bath , Bath, UK

4. Department of Epidemiology, The Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) , Los Angeles, CA, USA

5. Department of Statistics and Data Science, Division of Physical Sciences, UCLA , Los Angeles, CA, USA

6. Department of Public Health, Research Unit for Epidemiology, Aarhus University , Aarhus, Denmark

7. Practical Causal Inference Lab, UCLA , Los Angeles, CA, USA

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents causal loop diagrams (CLDs) as tools for studying complex public health problems like health inequality. These problems often involve feedback loops—a characteristic of complex systems not fully integrated into mainstream epidemiology. CLDs are conceptual models that visualize connections between system variables. They are commonly developed through literature reviews or participatory methods with stakeholder groups. These diagrams often uncover feedback loops among variables across scales (e.g. biological, psychological and social), facilitating cross-disciplinary insights. We illustrate their use through a case example involving the feedback loop between sleep problems and depressive symptoms. We outline a typical step-by-step process for developing CLDs in epidemiology. These steps are defining a specific problem, identifying the key system variables involved, mapping these variables and analysing the CLD to find new insights and possible intervention targets. Throughout this process, we suggest triangulating between diverse sources of evidence, including domain knowledge, scientific literature and empirical data. CLDs can also be evaluated to guide policy changes and future research by revealing knowledge gaps. Finally, CLDs may be iteratively refined as new evidence emerges. We advocate for more widespread use of complex systems tools, like CLDs, in epidemiology to better understand and address complex public health problems.

Funder

Lundbeck Foundation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3