Near real-time patient experience feedback with data relay to providers: a systematic review of its effectiveness

Author:

Jesus Tiago S12ORCID,Struhar Jan3,Zhang Manrui2,Lee Dongwook4,Stern Brocha Z5,Heinemann Allen W67,Jordan Neil89,Deutsch Anne6710

Affiliation:

1. Division of Occupational Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University , 453 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, United States

2. Center for Education in Health Sciences, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine , 420 E Superior St, Chicago, IL 60611, United States

3. Nerve, Muscle and Bone Innovation Center & Oncology Innovation Center, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab , 355 E Erie St, Chicago, IL 60611, United States

4. Center for Child Development & Research, Sensory EL, ROK; Dept. of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Medicine, Korehab Clinic , Building 64 - Ground Floor, F Block - Dubai Healthcare City, Dubai, UAE

5. Institute for Healthcare Delivery Science, Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , 1 Gustave L. Levy Pl, New York, NY 10029, United States

6. Center for Rehabilitation Outcomes Research, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab , 355 E Erie St, Chicago, IL 60611, United States

7. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine , 420 E Superior St, Chicago, IL 60611, United States

8. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Department of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine , 420 E Superior St, Chicago, IL 60611, United States

9. Center of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare, Hines VA Hospital , 5000 5th Ave, Hines, IL 60141, United States

10. Center for Health Care Outcomes, RTI International , 10 S. Riverside Plaza #875, Chicago, IL 60606, United States

Abstract

Abstract Near Real-Time Feedback (NRTF) on the patient’s experience with care, coupled with data relay to providers, can inform quality-of-care improvements, including at the point of care. The objective is to systematically review contemporary literature on the impact of the use of NRTF and data relay to providers on standardized patient experience measures. Six scientific databases and five specialty journals were searched supplemented by snowballing search strategies, according to the registered study protocol. Eligibility included studies in English (2015–2023) assessing the impact of NRTF and data relay on standardized patient-reported experience measures as a primary outcome. Eligibility and quality appraisals were performed by two independent reviewers. An expert former patient (Patient and Family Advisory Council and communication sciences background) helped interpret the results. Eight papers met review eligibility criteria, including three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one non-randomized study. Three of these studies involved in-person NRTF prior to data relay (patient-level data for immediate corrective action or aggregated and peer-compared) and led to significantly better results in all or some of the experience measures. In turn, a kiosk-based NRTF achieved no better experience results. The remaining studies were pre-post designs with mixed or neutral results and greater risks of bias. In-person NRTF on the patient experience followed by rapid data relay to their providers, either patient-level or provider-level as peer-compared, can improve the patient experience of care. Reviewed kiosk-based or self-reported approaches combined with data relay were not effective. Further research should determine which approach (e.g. who conducts the in-person NRTF) will provide better, more efficient improvements and under which circumstances.

Funder

National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference33 articles.

1. The care we need: driving better outcomes for people and communities: NQF;National Quality Forum,2020

2. What Is Patient Experience?;Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

3. A user’s manual for the IOM’s ‘Quality Chasm’ report;Berwick;Health Affairs (Project Hope),2002

4. The quintuple aim for health care improvement: a new imperative to advance health equity;Nundy;Jama,2022

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3